2005
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.71.060801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium bundle size of rodlike polyelectrolytes with counterion-induced attractive interactions

Abstract: Multivalent counterions can induce an effective attraction between like-charged rodlike polyelectrolytes, leading to the formation of polelectrolyte bundles. In this paper, we calculate the equilibrium bundle size using a simple model in which the attraction between polyelectrolytes (assumed to be pairwise additive) is treated phenomenologically. If the counterions are point-like, they almost completely neutralize the charge of the bundle, and the equilibrium bundle size diverges. When the counterions are larg… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the thermodynamic description of such an assembly process, the classical nucleation model, there can be no equilibrium limitation to the growth in the presence of a net free energy gain per aggregated filament. To explain this apparent contradiction, a number of theoretical mechanisms for the self-limited growth have emerged, focusing variously on the specialized nature of forces between filaments condensed in the presence of multi-valent counterions [41,42] as well as the elastic cost of defects forced into bundles by rapid quenching [43] or by the toroidal topology of bundles form by long strands of DNA [44]. In conflict with assumptions of "electrostatic" mechanisms for limited growth, finite-sized bundles are observed even when bundles are condensed in the absence of multi-valent ions, for example, by depletion forces [37,38] or through the incorporation of specialized cross-linking proteins [39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the thermodynamic description of such an assembly process, the classical nucleation model, there can be no equilibrium limitation to the growth in the presence of a net free energy gain per aggregated filament. To explain this apparent contradiction, a number of theoretical mechanisms for the self-limited growth have emerged, focusing variously on the specialized nature of forces between filaments condensed in the presence of multi-valent counterions [41,42] as well as the elastic cost of defects forced into bundles by rapid quenching [43] or by the toroidal topology of bundles form by long strands of DNA [44]. In conflict with assumptions of "electrostatic" mechanisms for limited growth, finite-sized bundles are observed even when bundles are condensed in the absence of multi-valent ions, for example, by depletion forces [37,38] or through the incorporation of specialized cross-linking proteins [39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an infinitely large bundle [6], experiments always find finite-sized bundles [2,3]. To explain this, it has been suggested that the theoretically expected phase separation may be hindered by kinetic barriers [7], steric effects [8], or frustration of the local structure with energy penalty [3,9]. The phenomenon of bundle formation has also been studied using computer simulation, which indicated a tendency towards a well defined finite size [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stabilization mechanism of counterioninduced bundles is proposed to be similar to that of colloidal clusters (17,18); steric and short-range electrostatic interactions or frustration within the bundles prevent charge neutralization and limit the bundle size (19). Alternatively, the finite size of chiral biopolymers has been suggested to result from a buildup of in-plane shear elastic stresses (20), which can result in braided structures (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bundle diameter could, in principle, be either kinetically (25)(26)(27) or thermodynamically (19,20) constrained. However, the independence of the bundle diameter on the preparation method and system used strongly suggests an equilibrium mechanism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%