2017 6th International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iccep.2017.8004730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium approach to the single solution of longer- and shorter-term hydro-thermal scheduling problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. If not, add a new feasibility cut of type (9) to C F at for EERs with infeasible trial solutions. To limit the computational expense involved with solving (6), it was found efficient checking hydropower feasibility only in the forward SDDP iteration.…”
Section: B Dynamic Feasibility Cutsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3. If not, add a new feasibility cut of type (9) to C F at for EERs with infeasible trial solutions. To limit the computational expense involved with solving (6), it was found efficient checking hydropower feasibility only in the forward SDDP iteration.…”
Section: B Dynamic Feasibility Cutsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Dynamic Feasibility Cuts (DYN-FC) using the same SDDP formulation as in REF, but with dynamic construction and addition of feasibility cuts (9) in the forward SDDP iterations, as described in Section IV-B. 3.…”
Section: A System and Case Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, those corresponding to the cases where the water value is computed with Model 2 are by far the highest. The "extreme" behaviour of both the models is due to the modelling inconsistencies existing between the short-term scheduling and the medium-term one, as discussed in [39] and [40]. Model 1/Model 2 tends to underestimate/overestimate the plant's water value [25], and for this reason, the short-term scheduling model tends to keep a lower/higher reservoir volume than in the cases where the water value was computed with Model 3 and Model 4, which are consistent with the power plant's operation strategy.…”
Section: Number Of Integer Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%