2019
DOI: 10.3386/w25607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equilibrium Allocations under Alternative Waitlist Designs: Evidence from Deceased Donor Kidneys

Abstract: NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agarwal et al (2018) presented descriptive evidence consistent with dynamic incentives using data from all areas of the United States and find that highly sensitized patients who are immunologically compatible with fewer donors —and who therefore expect to receive fewer offers in the future—are more likely than less sensitized patients to accept similar offers. We replicated this research strategy in the NYRT sample and found qualitatively similar patterns (see Section D.2 in the Supplemental Material (Agarwal, Ashlagi, Rees, Somaini, and Waldinger, 2021)). We refer the reader to this paper for a more detailed discussion of the empirical strategy and potential confounds.…”
Section: Background Data and Descriptive Evidencesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Agarwal et al (2018) presented descriptive evidence consistent with dynamic incentives using data from all areas of the United States and find that highly sensitized patients who are immunologically compatible with fewer donors —and who therefore expect to receive fewer offers in the future—are more likely than less sensitized patients to accept similar offers. We replicated this research strategy in the NYRT sample and found qualitatively similar patterns (see Section D.2 in the Supplemental Material (Agarwal, Ashlagi, Rees, Somaini, and Waldinger, 2021)). We refer the reader to this paper for a more detailed discussion of the empirical strategy and potential confounds.…”
Section: Background Data and Descriptive Evidencesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The acceptance thresholds depend on the agent's position s and the mechanism M because these quantities influence the value of waiting. Agarwal et al (2018) show how to estimate the values of various object attributes in a similar dynamic choice model using data on accept-reject decisions and knowledge of the mechanism. They apply their methods to data on decisions from the deceased donor kidney wait list.…”
Section: A a Model Of Decisions On A Wait Listmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, less than 0.2 percent of all offers are accepted by patients, but the total number of transplants indicate that the organs from most donors are transplanted. As Agarwal et al (2018) discuss, this low acceptance rate is a result of relatively undesirable organs being offered to several thousand patients. Indeed, the acceptance rate amongst the top 10 offers is 18.1 percent, and still higher at the very top of the list.…”
Section: A Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a limited but growing body of literature on ESRD patients' preferences. A recent paper by Agarwal et al (2019) establishes an empirical framework to analyse how tradeoffs embedded in waitlist systems map into individual preferences and applies it to the allocation of deceased donor kidneys. The researchers develop a method for estimating patient preferences using administrative data and apply it to the kidney waitlist data from New York to estimate payoffs from various types of transplants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%