2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10958-009-9366-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equiangular tight frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the case where the sparsity level of the signal is greater than two, we provide a lower bound on the worst-case performance. If the number m of measurements allowed is greater than or equal to √ N , then the Grassmannian line packing frame will be an equiangular uniform tight frame (see, e.g., [26]- [33]) and the maximal worst-case SNR can be expressed in terms of the Welch bound. Numerical examples presented in Section 7 show that Grassmannian line packing frames provide better worst-case performance than matrices with i.i.d.…”
Section: Problem Statement and Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the case where the sparsity level of the signal is greater than two, we provide a lower bound on the worst-case performance. If the number m of measurements allowed is greater than or equal to √ N , then the Grassmannian line packing frame will be an equiangular uniform tight frame (see, e.g., [26]- [33]) and the maximal worst-case SNR can be expressed in terms of the Welch bound. Numerical examples presented in Section 7 show that Grassmannian line packing frames provide better worst-case performance than matrices with i.i.d.…”
Section: Problem Statement and Main Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2: Methods for constructing uniform tight frames with frame elements that have a coherence µ * is equivalent to optimal Grassmannian packings of one-dimensional subspaces, or Grassmannian line packings (see, e.g., [25]- [33]). We will say more about this point later in the paper.…”
Section: Sparsity Level K =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other cases where N and m do not satisfy the condition (19) or (20), the bound (16) suggests that we use an optimal Grassmannian packing where the k largest angles among angles between column pairs of the matrix C * H are as close to the angle α as possible. This is, however, a very difficult problem since even finding optimal Grassmannian packings for different values of N and m is still an open problem.…”
Section: Equiangular Uniform Tight Frames and Grassmannian Packingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further analyze (9) we note that for an arbitrary P × Q matrix, its coherence is bounded by μ ≥ √ Q−P P (Q−1) , a bound known as the Welch bound [10]. Moreover, this bound is achieved only if all pairs of columns have the same magnitude inner product, which is then equal to this lower bound (such matrices are called equiangular tight frames (ETF) [11]). In the case of no overlap (p = m = √ M ), C and Φ0 can be designed freely.…”
Section: Coherence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%