Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2016.2587865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equiangular Tight Frames From Hyperovals

Abstract: Abstract-An equiangular tight frame (ETF) is a set of equal norm vectors in a Euclidean space whose coherence is as small as possible, equaling the Welch bound. Also known as Welch-bound-equality sequences, such frames arise in various applications, such as waveform design, quantum information theory, compressed sensing and algebraic coding theory. ETFs seem to be rare, and only a few methods of constructing them are known. In this paper, we present a new infinite family of complex ETFs that arises from hypero… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This results in a collection of vectors in Cfalse|mfalse| which look like the vectors in normalΦ padded with |m||D| zero rows. Thus, the vectors form an equiangular tight frame for their span . It was further shown in that equiangular tight frames formed from the so‐called McFarland difference sets are equivalent to certain Steiner equiangular tight frames.…”
Section: Gabor–steiner Equiangular Tight Framesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This results in a collection of vectors in Cfalse|mfalse| which look like the vectors in normalΦ padded with |m||D| zero rows. Thus, the vectors form an equiangular tight frame for their span . It was further shown in that equiangular tight frames formed from the so‐called McFarland difference sets are equivalent to certain Steiner equiangular tight frames.…”
Section: Gabor–steiner Equiangular Tight Framesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Returning to the more general family of relaxations of the cut polytope described in Definition 1.2, the main question we propose for investigation is the following. Gershgorin NERF Our Bound Steiner: Affine [17] q 3 + 2q 2 q 2 + q q 2 + q q 2 + q − 1 q 2 + q Steiner: Projective [17] q 3 + 3q 2 + 3q + 2 q 2 + q + 1 q 2 + 2q + 2 q 2 + 3q + 1 q 2 + 3q + 2 Polyphase BIBD [13] q 3 + 1 q 2 − q + 1 q 2 + 1 q 2 + q − 1 q 2 + q Hyperovals [16] q 3 + q 2 − q q 2 + q − 1 q 2 q 2 − q + 3 q 2 − q + 4 Table 1: Spark Lower Bound Comparison. We tabulate three lower bounds on the spark of ETFs of N vectors in R r formed as the Naimark complements of ETFs belonging to infinite families with N ∼ r 3/2 .…”
Section: Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the analysis operator Φ * : H → C N extends to an operator Φ * : K → C N and {ϕ n } n∈N is a tight frame for its span precisely when ΦΦ * x = Cx for all x ∈ H = span({ϕ n } n∈N ) = C(Φ). As shown in [24], this is equivalent to having either ΦΦ * Φ = CΦ, (ΦΦ * ) 2 = CΦΦ * or (Φ * Φ) 2 = CΦ * Φ. In particular, {ϕ n } n∈N is a C-tight frame for some D-dimensional space if and only if its Gram matrix Φ * Φ has eigenvalues C and 0 with multiplicity D and N − D, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Steiner ETFs arise from balanced incomplete block designs [26,25]. This construction has recently been generalized to yield new infinite families of ETFs arising from projective planes that contain hyperovals, Steiner triple systems, and group divisible designs [24,21,19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%