2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017sw001641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equatorial plasma bubble generation/inhibition during 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm

Abstract: All‐sky camera observations carried out over Taiwan showed intense equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs) in 630.0 nm airglow images on consecutive nights of 13–16 March 2015 but were absent in the following night of 17 March when St. Patrick's Day magnetic storm occurred. Rate of total electron content (TEC) index by using Global Positioning System (GPS) network data also confirmed the absence of irregularities on the night 17 March. The results, however, revealed strong irregularities over Indian sector on the sam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neutral winds observations are therefore necessary to fully understand the longitudinal differences in the altitudes of EPBs. On the other hand, the inhomogeneous distribution of Es layer, geomagnetic storms, and the midlatitude ionospheric instabilities (i.e., medium‐scale traveling ionospheric disturbances, MSTIDs) could be another source to suppress the altitudinal extent of EPBs, making the altitudinal asymmetry of EPBs (e.g., Huba et al, 2020; Otsuka et al, 2012; Rajesh et al, 2017; Stephan et al, 2002).…”
Section: Observations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neutral winds observations are therefore necessary to fully understand the longitudinal differences in the altitudes of EPBs. On the other hand, the inhomogeneous distribution of Es layer, geomagnetic storms, and the midlatitude ionospheric instabilities (i.e., medium‐scale traveling ionospheric disturbances, MSTIDs) could be another source to suppress the altitudinal extent of EPBs, making the altitudinal asymmetry of EPBs (e.g., Huba et al, 2020; Otsuka et al, 2012; Rajesh et al, 2017; Stephan et al, 2002).…”
Section: Observations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, equinoctial EPBs in moderate solar flux years around the India, Asia, and Pacific Ocean regions do not grow much higher compared with those in low solar flux years. It could be due to lower occurrence and growth rates or suppression of EPBs (e.g., Huba & Krall, 2013; Krall et al, 2009; Maruyama, 1988; Otsuka et al, 2012; Rajesh et al, 2017; Stephan et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irregularities were similarly suppressed over the Taiwanese sector but not over the Indian sector on 17 March 2015. Using an all‐sky imager observations and GPS‐derived ROTI index, Rajesh et al () found that on 14 March 2015, before the storm, irregularities in the form of EPBs were generated, while the altitude of maximum flux tube integrated density gradient was above 300 km over the Taiwanese and Indian longitudinal sectors. This height level (300 km) is a significant factor in the development of EPBs according to Ajith et al ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdu et al () reported the inhibition of the equatorial PRE and the postsunset spread F due to the westward DDEF in the evening during the storm recovery. Recently, Rajesh et al () discussed the inhibition of the irregularities over Taiwan during the 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm, and they suggested that the westward overshielding electric field resulting from transient northward turning of IMF Bz around the dusk was responsible for the FAIs inhibition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%