1973
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(73)90008-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equatorial electrojet—II. Use of the model to study the equatorial ionosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quiet-day curve in Figure 2 shows the usual steady decrease of H field in the afternoon due to solar zenith angle-dependent variation of ionospheric conductivity. Note that this feature is more prominent at stations close to the dip equator (TRD, KOD, and ANN) than at stations farther away (ABG and UJJ) because of the well-known contribution of the equatorial electrojet [e.g., Matsushita, 1967;Richmond, 1973]. In contrast, on August 19 a distinct positive baylike increase of H field (marked by arrows in Figure 2) is seen at all the stations from Trivandrum to Ujjain starting around 0730 UT, i.e., during the initial stage of the substorm growth phase.…”
Section: Event Of August 19 1978mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quiet-day curve in Figure 2 shows the usual steady decrease of H field in the afternoon due to solar zenith angle-dependent variation of ionospheric conductivity. Note that this feature is more prominent at stations close to the dip equator (TRD, KOD, and ANN) than at stations farther away (ABG and UJJ) because of the well-known contribution of the equatorial electrojet [e.g., Matsushita, 1967;Richmond, 1973]. In contrast, on August 19 a distinct positive baylike increase of H field (marked by arrows in Figure 2) is seen at all the stations from Trivandrum to Ujjain starting around 0730 UT, i.e., during the initial stage of the substorm growth phase.…”
Section: Event Of August 19 1978mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5), one can see that when the primary zonal electric field E 0 does not vary with altitude, the current J X must have a height variation similar to that of the Cowling conductivity. But in-situ rocket observations of currents from the equatorial stations in India and Peru show that vertical profiles of J X deviate significantly from that of σ C Subbraya et al, 1972;Richmond, 1973;Muralikrishna, 1975;Pfaff et al, 1997;Prakash and Subbraya, 1999). Subbaraya et al (1972) estimated the elctrojet current intensity from rocket measurements of the total magnetic field using proton precession magnetometers, and the electron density by Langmuir probes from Thumba (magnetic dip 0 • 47 S), India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is known that the presence of meridional currents in this region can modify this simple image (Sugiura and Porus, 1969). Several modifications have later been suggested to modify this simple picture (see Richmond, 1991). From Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, we could use values from data gathered by rocket instruments but, in an active electrojet, these small values have proven nearly impossible to measure. Instead, we follow the example of Richmond (1973b) and solve for typical values for E x and U x by introducing known electrojet current profiles into Eqs. (10) and (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%