1976
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(76)90118-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equatorial electrojet and regular daily variation SR—III. Comparison of observations with a physical model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3A) for instance, a minimum value in the H variation is clearly visible at the Nielle (NIE), Sikasso (SIK) and Koutiala (KOU) stations prior to the beginning of the typical S R E variation. This minimum marks the presence of a morning counter electrojet (Gouin and Mayaud, 1967;Fambitakoye and Mayaud, 1976c) which was not clearly marked at the other stations because of the latitudinal asymmetry of the counter-electrojet with respect to the dip equator.…”
Section: Quiet Magnetic Situationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3A) for instance, a minimum value in the H variation is clearly visible at the Nielle (NIE), Sikasso (SIK) and Koutiala (KOU) stations prior to the beginning of the typical S R E variation. This minimum marks the presence of a morning counter electrojet (Gouin and Mayaud, 1967;Fambitakoye and Mayaud, 1976c) which was not clearly marked at the other stations because of the latitudinal asymmetry of the counter-electrojet with respect to the dip equator.…”
Section: Quiet Magnetic Situationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The magnetic variations recorded during 171 quiet or almost-quiet days were digitized at the nine stations. An analysis of this unique magnetic data set resulted in an important contribution to the understanding of the temporal and spatial behavior of the equatorial electrojet (Fambitakoye, 1976;Fambitakoye and Mayaud, 1976a, b, c;Fambitakoye et al, 1976). In particular, the experiment provided quite clear experimental evidence that the internal part of the observed diurnal variation in the S R E of the magnetic ®eld is very weak, and practically negligible in the equatorial electrojet region (Fambitakoye and Mayaud, 1973;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FAMBITAKOYE and MAYAUD (1976c) have gone on to demonstrate the variability from day-to-day of the regular daily variation SR, which is attributed to the presence of the counter electrojet and to neutral winds in the equatorial ionosphere. FAMBITAKOYE et al (1976) have demonstrated that east-west winds can create current flow opposed to the primary electrojet, and that these winds augment the planetary component of SR around midday over values produced purely by magnetospheric electric fields. Finally, we note that MAYAUD (1976c) has failed to find evidence of regular variations of the magnetic field at ground level which OLSON (1970) predicted should result from magnetopause, neutral sheet and ring current effects and should be measurable at quiet times.…”
Section: Magnetic and Electric Fields And Current Flow At Middle And mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The parameters s and J DC are determined by least-squares inversion of equation (12), under the constraint that the left and right hand sides of that equation must agree at the dip equator (y = p/2). This constraint has been found to yield more accurate electric fields [Alken and Maus, 2010b], since the EEF is primarily responsible for current structure near the dip equator, while the winds are primarily responsible for current structure at higher latitudes [Fambitakoye et al, 1976].…”
Section: Modeling the Equatorial Electrojet Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%