2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsc.2004.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equations of parametric surfaces with base points via syzygies

Abstract: Let S be a parametrized surface in P 3 given as the image of φ : P 1 × P 1 → P 3 . This paper will show that the use of syzygies in the form of a combination of moving planes and moving quadrics provides a valid method for finding the implicit equation of S when certain base points are present. This work extends the algorithm provided by Cox [5] for when φ has no base points, and it is analogous to some of the results of Busé, Cox, and D'Andrea [2] for the case when φ : P 2 → P 3 has base points.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T = P 2 , and [BCD03] does the same in the presence of base points. In [AHW05], square matrix representations of bihomogeneous parametrizations, i.e. T = P 1 × P 1 , are constructed with linear and quadratic syzygies, whereas [KD06] gives such a construction for parametrizations over toric varieties of dimension 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T = P 2 , and [BCD03] does the same in the presence of base points. In [AHW05], square matrix representations of bihomogeneous parametrizations, i.e. T = P 1 × P 1 , are constructed with linear and quadratic syzygies, whereas [KD06] gives such a construction for parametrizations over toric varieties of dimension 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be summarized by the following commutative diagram, which is the algebraic translation of the diagram (1).…”
Section: The Segre Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1] a determinantal representation of the implicit equation of a bi-homogeneous parametrization is constructed with linear and quadratic relations, whereas [12] gives such a construction in the toric case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear transformation C ( +1)(m+1) → C n+1 (also denoted by P) induces a projection map P : CP m+ +m → CP n , which is well-defined for all elements in the domain except those lines in the kernel of P. It will be convenient to follow some of the recent literature on implicitization (e.g., [1,3,9]), and borrow some terminology from the classical (and not unrelated; see [15,§III.1]) theory of linear systems of quadrics. Definition 2.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the rank is invariant under real equivalence, we only need to inspect the list of canonical forms to find pairs (E, F) so that E + iF is a rank 1 complex matrix. Clearly, the proposition's cases 8, 9, and 12 span complex pencils which fall into the theorem's case (1). The proposition's cases 7 and 9 correspond to the theorem's cases (2) and (3), respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%