1979
DOI: 10.24033/asens.1366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Équations différentielles caractéristiques de la sphère

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
107
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
4
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characterisation due to Bär [49] establishes that R admits a Killing spinor (with imaginary Killing constant) if and only if C(R) admits a parallel spinor. If R is complete, it follows from [47,53] that Hol ∇ (C(R)) must be either SU( r+1 2 ), Sp( r+1 4 ), G 2 (if r = 6), Spin(7) (if r = 7) or trivial. In these cases, R is respectively Einstein-Sasakian, 3-Sasakian, nearly Kähler, weak G 2 or a sphere.…”
Section: If ε Is Not Parallel Then M Is Locally Isometric To Eithermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characterisation due to Bär [49] establishes that R admits a Killing spinor (with imaginary Killing constant) if and only if C(R) admits a parallel spinor. If R is complete, it follows from [47,53] that Hol ∇ (C(R)) must be either SU( r+1 2 ), Sp( r+1 4 ), G 2 (if r = 6), Spin(7) (if r = 7) or trivial. In these cases, R is respectively Einstein-Sasakian, 3-Sasakian, nearly Kähler, weak G 2 or a sphere.…”
Section: If ε Is Not Parallel Then M Is Locally Isometric To Eithermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will moreover assume that X is simply connected. This allows us to use a result of Gallot's [6] quoted in [4], which says that the cone over a compact simply-connected manifold is either flat, so that the manifold is the round sphere, or irreducible. Finally, the simply-connected irreducible manifolds admitting parallel spinors have been classified by Wang [18].…”
Section: Killing Spinors and Parallel Spinorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides providing an important step in the proof of Theorem 1, Theorem 5 could be interesting on its own since investigation of parallel tensor fields on cone manifolds is a classical topic, see for example [1,6,21].…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%