Equality in education

Abstract

ab s t rac tTransforming schools into truly egalitarian institutions requires a holistic and integrated approach. Using a robust conception of 'equality of condition', we examine key dimensions of equality that are central to both the purposes and processes of education: equality in educational and related resources; equality of respect and recognition; equality of power; and equality of love, care and solidarity.We indicate in each case some of the major changes that need to occur if we are to promote equality of condition. Starting with inequalities of resources, and in particular with inequalities tied to social class, we argue for abandoning rigid grouping policies, challenging the power of parents in relation to both selection and grouping, and changing curricula and assessment systems to make them more inclusive of the wide range of human intelligences. In relation to respect and recognition, we call for much more inclusive processes for respecting differences, not only in schools' organizational cultures, but also in their curriculum, pedagogy and assessment systems. Regarding inequalities of power, we call for democratization of both teacher-student relationships and school and college organization. For promoting equality of love, care and solidarity, we argue that schools need to develop an appreciation of the intrinsic role that emotions play in the process of teaching and learning, to provide a space for students and teachers to talk about their feelings and concerns, and to devise educational experiences that will enable students to develop their emotional skills or personal intelligences as a discrete area of human capability. ke ywo r d s democracy, emotions, equality, recognition, social class i n t r o duc t i o n M o st o f t h e discussion about equality in education is focused on how to equalize access to and participation within different levels of formal education [ 1 3 1 ] Theory and Research in Education

Markets, schools and the convertibility of economic capital: the complex dynamics of class choice

“…It is set against a structural background of economic and social policies in taxation, housing, health, welfare and inheritance that places upper and middle class families at a considerable advantage economically and therefore educationally (Cantillon et al, 2001, Fahey et al, 2004, Healy & Reynolds, 1998, Lynch, 1999, Nolan et al, 2000. Those who have superior economic resources can exercise choice, not just between schools, but between schools and the private market.…”

A queer politics of emotion: reimagining sexualities and schooling

“…1 has largely appeared as the separate 'other' to the rational business of mainstream education (Britzman 2009;Lynch 2001;Kenway and Youdell 2011). It has been 'allowed in' primarily through the filter of educational psychology (Kenway and Youdell 2011, 132).…”

Društveni aspekti matematičkog obrazovanja

“…Ova se marginalizacija uobličuje kroz karakteristične interakcijske obrasce u razredu gdje primjerice »učenici višega socioekonomskog statusa pokazuju više povjerenja u svoje sposobnosti za sudjelovanje u raspravi i za rješavanje matematičkih problema, dok učenici nižega socioekonomskog statusa traže određenije upute od strane nastavnika i teksta« (Lubienski, 2001, prema Woodrow, 2003. Opisane se razlike u postignućima u konačnici manifestiraju i kroz obrasce (ne)formalnog grupiranja prema socioekonomskom statusu učenika i njihovih roditelja (Lynch i Baker, 2005). Ovo uključuje sustavne nejednakosti u dostupnosti matematičkih sadržaja (ovisno o tipu škole i/ili razini programske diferencijacije u školi ili razredu),…”