2012
DOI: 10.2478/v10062-012-0009-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equality cases for condenser capacity inequalities under symmetrization

Abstract: Abstract. We prove that any first order F 2 Mm 1 ,m 2 ,n 1 ,n 2 -natural operator transforming projectable general connections on an (m1, m2, n1, n2The aim of this paper is to describe all F 2 M m 1 ,m 2 ,n 1 ,n 2 -natural operators transforming projectable general connections on an (m 1 , m 2 , n 1 , n 2 )-dimensional fibred-fibred manifolds into general connections on the vertical prolongation V Y → M of p : Y → M . The similar problem for the case of fibred manifolds was solving in [7]. In the paper [1], au… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since every end point x ∈ S(x * , r) of the radial segment from x * to x, which is in the spherical cone Φ, satisfies condition (3.7) it follows that µ D (x 0 , x) is constant on Φ. Obviously, Φ has interior points and the latter conclusion contradicts the fact established in part (1) of this proof that µ(x) can not have relative minimum in B(x 0 , R 0 ) \ {x 0 }. Thus, our assumption was wrong and µ D (x 0 , x) does not have relative maxima in B(x 0 , R 0 ).…”
Section: An Elementary Geometric Calculation Shows That Ifmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since every end point x ∈ S(x * , r) of the radial segment from x * to x, which is in the spherical cone Φ, satisfies condition (3.7) it follows that µ D (x 0 , x) is constant on Φ. Obviously, Φ has interior points and the latter conclusion contradicts the fact established in part (1) of this proof that µ(x) can not have relative minimum in B(x 0 , R 0 ) \ {x 0 }. Thus, our assumption was wrong and µ D (x 0 , x) does not have relative maxima in B(x 0 , R 0 ).…”
Section: An Elementary Geometric Calculation Shows That Ifmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In dimension n = 2, the cases when equality occurs in (3.2) were discussed under a variety of assumptions in [4], [13], and [1]. Also, in dimensions n ≥ 3, the cases of equality in polarization inequalities for the Newtonian capacity were discussed in [13] and [1]. In dimensions n ≥ 3, the question on the cases when equality sign occurs in (3.2), i.e.…”
Section: Theorem 3 ([4]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W. Gehring gives a proof of the above in [7], also showing that the same is true if we consider the hyperbolic or the elliptic areas instead of the Euclidean. The equality conditions were studied in [3] for the Euclidean and in [2] for the hyperbolic case. We will prove an analogous condition for the elliptic case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ïé áðïäåßîåéò ôùí ÈåùñçìÜôùí 6, 7 êáé 8 äßíïíôáé óôï ÊåöÜëáéï 6 (âë. åðßóçò [14]). ç ïðïßá ÷áñáêôçñßaeåé ôéò K-çìéêáíïíéêÝò (quasiregular) áðåéêïíßóåéò óôï åðßðåäï (âë.…”
Section: ðõêíùôýò êáé ïëüìïñöåò êéíþóåéòunclassified