2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1369-8486(03)00025-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Equal though different’: laboratories, museums and the institutional development of biology in late-Victorian Northern England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, he refers to three subjects that shaped the main discussions that took place in Europe around biology: form (understood from cell theory and the development of individuals), function (from the idea of the "animal machine"), and transformation (with particular emphasis on the role of Darwin's ideas). More recently, in historiographical terms, the history of biology has focused on reconstructing localised episodes, both geographically (Alberti, 2001(Alberti, , 2005Kraft, Alberti, 2003) and theoretically (Morgan, 1980;Kraft, 2004;Erlingsson, 2009Erlingsson, , 2013Button, 2018). This paper intends to follow a historiographical line that, beyond seeking to understand biology in a broad sense, will attempt to reconstruct a scientific practice that emerged as part of the interaction between scientific and political interests in a specific geographical context, namely Great Britain in the second half of the nineteenth century.…”
Section: The Institutionalisation Of Biology In the Britishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, he refers to three subjects that shaped the main discussions that took place in Europe around biology: form (understood from cell theory and the development of individuals), function (from the idea of the "animal machine"), and transformation (with particular emphasis on the role of Darwin's ideas). More recently, in historiographical terms, the history of biology has focused on reconstructing localised episodes, both geographically (Alberti, 2001(Alberti, , 2005Kraft, Alberti, 2003) and theoretically (Morgan, 1980;Kraft, 2004;Erlingsson, 2009Erlingsson, , 2013Button, 2018). This paper intends to follow a historiographical line that, beyond seeking to understand biology in a broad sense, will attempt to reconstruct a scientific practice that emerged as part of the interaction between scientific and political interests in a specific geographical context, namely Great Britain in the second half of the nineteenth century.…”
Section: The Institutionalisation Of Biology In the Britishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Livingstone (2003: 42) writes that the field, for instance, is 'an open space […] less easily defined, bounded, and policed than its intramural counterparts like the laboratory or the museum'. In a similar vein, it has been argued that 'cultural translation remains a persistent and pervasive possibility in the field sciences, far more than in the laboratory disciplines' and that relationships between professionals and amateurs in field sciences 'have almost no parallel in the laboratory sciences' (Kuklick and Kohler 1996: 4, see also Kraft and Alberti 2003). Perhaps, with the rise of synthetic biology and do-it-yourself biology, the laboratory can now also potentially become a place of 'cultural translation' between amateurs and professionals.…”
Section: Spaces and Boundaries Of Amateur Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, it is common to argue in the history of science that the museum used to be the characteristic locus of scholarship and research until the nineteenth century but that, over time, laboratories came to displace this role (Forgan 1994). Of course, the laboratory has not eclipsed the museum; rather it has supplemented it (Kraft and Alberti 2003), and there are still continuities between the museum and laboratory traditions. To put it another way, museums and laboratories are 'equal though different' (Kraft and Alberti 2003).…”
Section: ! "#*!mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the laboratory has not eclipsed the museum; rather it has supplemented it (Kraft and Alberti 2003), and there are still continuities between the museum and laboratory traditions. To put it another way, museums and laboratories are 'equal though different' (Kraft and Alberti 2003). One of the key differences is arguably the distance between the expert and the layperson, and between science and the public.…”
Section: ! "#*!mentioning
confidence: 99%