2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-018-6399-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EQRAIN: uranium and plutonium interlaboratory exercises from 1997 to 2016—comparison to ITVs-2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These PTs are typically organized every 18 months. 23 The content values lie in the ranges of 1 to 6 g kg −1 for Pu and 50 to 200 g kg −1 for U, and are designed for laboratories connected with the mining or reprocessing industries, institutions for safeguards or institutions dealing with reference materials.…”
Section: Inter-laboratory Comparisons Involving Id-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These PTs are typically organized every 18 months. 23 The content values lie in the ranges of 1 to 6 g kg −1 for Pu and 50 to 200 g kg −1 for U, and are designed for laboratories connected with the mining or reprocessing industries, institutions for safeguards or institutions dealing with reference materials.…”
Section: Inter-laboratory Comparisons Involving Id-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 From the list of primary methods, ID-MS is the most widely used one in U and Pu amount determination interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs). 23 Furthermore, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) considers ID-MS as one of the most accurate methods in terms of the International Target Values (ITVs) for measurement uncertainties applied on safeguarding nuclear materials. 24,25 TIMS and ICP-MS are the techniques of choice to measure the isotope ratio of most elements, 26 for example radionuclides such as Sr, 27 Cs, [28][29][30] Nd, [31][32][33][34] Th, 35,36 U, 33,[37][38][39][40][41] Pu, 3,33,38,40,[42][43][44][45] Am 7,31,38 and Cm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main advantages of PT interlaboratory comparisons are: the wide variety of matrices and analytes possibly covered by these tests; the possibility of method performance comparison owing to the fact of their number of exercises, and/or numerous participating laboratories and compliance to standards in force [6].…”
Section: Interlaboratory Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%