1996
DOI: 10.1159/000456914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epstein-Barr Viral Antigens Used in the Diagnosis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Abstract: The major antigen complexes of Epstein-Barr virus (EBY) include the latent infectious proteins, early antigens, membrane antigens and viral capsid antigens. The various polypeptides within each antigen complex have been identified and isolated through gene-cloning technology. These polypeptides are exploited to be used as serological markers for the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. This paper reviews the recent studies on the profile of antibodies in patien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More over, ELISA is more accurate, better standardized and less subject to interoperator variability and interpretation than IFA. 10,19 Given that the six seromarkers detected by ELISA in our study have already been commercialized in China, ELISA is also more accessible and usable in a population setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More over, ELISA is more accurate, better standardized and less subject to interoperator variability and interpretation than IFA. 10,19 Given that the six seromarkers detected by ELISA in our study have already been commercialized in China, ELISA is also more accessible and usable in a population setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these performance characteristics for the two traditional seromarkers,9 the positive predictive value (PPV) was only 0.11–0.53%, assuming an NPC incidence rate of 10 to 50/105 person‐years. Other limitations of detecting seromarkers by conventional IFA include a lack of standardized methods, high intraobserver variation in results and time‐consuming protocols, making this method unsuitable for large‐scale testing and automated handling 10, 11. These inadequacies have driven researchers to search for alternative markers and methods with potentially higher accuracy, reliability and suitability for NPC mass screening.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The samples were taken to the central laboratory at Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) through cold‐chain transportation within 6 hours and then stored at −80°C before testing. Following the manufactures’ instructions, the two screening markers VCA‐IgA (EUROIMMUNAG, Lübeck, Germany) and EBNA1‐IgA (Zhongshan Bio‐Tech Company, Zhongshan, China) were measured using the commercial enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits . Levels of EBV antibodies were standardized by calculating a ratio of the optical density (OD) of the sample over that of a reference control (rOD).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the manufactures' instructions, the two screening markers VCA-IgA (EUROIMMUNAG, Lübeck, Germany) and EBNA1-IgA (Zhongshan Bio-Tech Company, Zhongshan, China) were measured using the commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. 31,33,34 Levels of EBV antibodies were standardized by calculating a ratio of the optical density (OD) of the sample over that of a reference control (rOD). According to the ELISA kits' standards, the positive criteria were ≥0.7 for EBNA1-IgA and ≥0.8 for VCA-IgA.…”
Section: Ebv Serological Testmentioning
confidence: 99%