Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1904575116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epsilon iron as a spin-smectic state

Abstract: Using x-ray emission spectroscopy, we find appreciable local magnetic moments until 30-40 GPa in the high-pressure phase of iron, however no magnetic order is detected with neutron powder diffraction down to 1.8 K contrary to previous predictions. Our first-principles calculations reveal a "spinsmectic" state lower in energy than previous results. This state forms antiferromagnetic bilayers separated by null spin bilayers, which allows a complete relaxation of the inherent frustration of antiferromagnetism on … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
19
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Incorporating a change of the spin moment with the spin-spiral wavevector might further improve our agreement to the earlier ab initio results of Knöpfle et al (Knöpfle et al, 2000) and Sjöstedt and Nordström (Sjöstedt and Nordström, 2002) and also the experimental spin-spiral wavevector (Tsunoda, 1989). The need to include spin moment change is also observed in the high-pressure ε-phase of iron (Lebert et al, 2019). Furthermore, including higher order exchange interactions (K i,j,k,l ≠ 0) could also be important.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Incorporating a change of the spin moment with the spin-spiral wavevector might further improve our agreement to the earlier ab initio results of Knöpfle et al (Knöpfle et al, 2000) and Sjöstedt and Nordström (Sjöstedt and Nordström, 2002) and also the experimental spin-spiral wavevector (Tsunoda, 1989). The need to include spin moment change is also observed in the high-pressure ε-phase of iron (Lebert et al, 2019). Furthermore, including higher order exchange interactions (K i,j,k,l ≠ 0) could also be important.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…We previously argued that the persistence of magnetism at pressures >18 GPa was due to a distorted hcp phase (Wei & Gilder, 2013; Wei et al., 2017). Indeed a recent combined X‐ray emission spectroscopy and neutron diffraction study is consistent with this conclusion (Lebert et al., 2019). However, we now think it is more likely that the remanent magnetization originates from nonconverted bcc‐Fe that goes undetected by XAFS, Mössbauer, XRD, etc.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…X-ray emission spectroscopy of Refs. [62,63] detected a magnetic signal, but it is not clear whether its origin is a static order or rapidly fluctuating local moments. The same very recent work [63] proposed a quasi-2d order of alternating AFM and "magnetically dead" layers for -Fe but their neutron diffraction measurements failed to detect any magnetic order in this phase down to 1.8 K at 20 GPa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[62,63] detected a magnetic signal, but it is not clear whether its origin is a static order or rapidly fluctuating local moments. The same very recent work [63] proposed a quasi-2d order of alternating AFM and "magnetically dead" layers for -Fe but their neutron diffraction measurements failed to detect any magnetic order in this phase down to 1.8 K at 20 GPa. The presence of a highfrequency satellite of the E 2g Raman mode in -Fe [64] was initially ascribed to a splitting of this mode in the AFM-ordered phase [60]; the satellite peak is, however, found to disappear at low temperatures, i. e., where the AFM state is supposed to be stable [65].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%