EPRB Gedankenexperiment and Entanglement with Classical Light Waves

Abstract

In this article we show that results similar to those of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm (EPRB) Gedankenexperiment and entanglement of photons can be obtained using weak classical light waves if we take into account the discrete (atomic) structure of the detectors and a specific nature of the light-atom interaction. We show that the CHSH (Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt) criterion in the EPRB Gedankenexperiment with classical light waves can exceed not only the maximum value SHV=2 that is predicted by the local hidden-variable theories but also the maximum value \({S_{QM}} = 2\sqrt 2 \) predicted by quantum mechanics.

Generalized Fock space and contextuality

“…The common opinion that such a representation does not exist was originally based on the straightforward interpretation of the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, negativity of the Wigner distribution, and later by various no-go theorems, e.g., the von Neumann, Kochen-Specker, and Bell theorems. However, the real situation is more complicated, see, e.g., Man'ko et al [13][14][15][16], Khrennikov et al [6][7][8][17][18][19], and Dzhafarov et al [20][21][22][23][24][25] See especially their recent works [13,25,19,26]; see also papers on the attempts to reproduce quantum probabilities and correlations by using theory of classical random fields [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”

“…However, the real situation is more complicated, e.g. Man'ko and colleagues [13][14][15][16], Khrennikov and colleagues [6][7][8][17][18][19] and Dzhafarov and colleagues [20][21][22][23][24][25] See especially their recent works [13,25,19,26]; see also papers on the attempts to reproduce quantum probabilities and correlations by using theory of classical random fields [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”

“…[ [20][21][22][23][24][25] See especially their recent works [13,25,19,26]; see also papers on the attempts to reproduce quantum probabilities and correlations by using theory of classical random fields [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”