1984
DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(84)90162-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EPR zeugmatography with modulated magnetic field gradient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept that underlies the MFG method is to measure the undistorted magnetic resonance signals from areas where no MFG is present (6–8). The signals from the rest of the region are not detected due to overmodulation of the field gradient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concept that underlies the MFG method is to measure the undistorted magnetic resonance signals from areas where no MFG is present (6–8). The signals from the rest of the region are not detected due to overmodulation of the field gradient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, a 3D image can be assembled by collecting m slices of n 2D projection data, which results in a considerably decreased imaging time. The modulated magnetic field gradient (MFG) method (6–8) in combination with continuous wave (CW) EPR imaging can be used to obtain multislice images of free radicals in mice for the first time within a limited time that has not been achieved previously. This slice‐selective imaging method should contribute to various biomedical studies of disease in animal models involving ROS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows how the distance of the maximum as a multiple of the sampling width depends upon the quotient of the apparent width and the sampling width. Thus the position of the maximum with respect to the true zero can be determined graphically or from the polynomial y = -0.0615 + 0.374d -0.0514d2 + 0.00254d3 (19) A graph of In c against the square of the distance, x, from the true zero gives the corrected gradient; see Eqn On re-examining our previously published data' ' we find that the correction of 7 mm used for the three sets of data was appropriate, the new corrections reported here being 7.0, 7.6 and 7.8 mm in order of increasing diffusion times. It should be noted that the error incurred by using the single value of 7 mm is less than 2 Yo.…”
Section: Corrected-zero Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wb by W, and use the polynomial given in Eqn (19) to determine the position of the maximum from the zero distance as a fraction, of the sampling width. 5.…”
Section: Dividementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a new method, the field gradient was modulated at a certain frequency (Herrling et al 1982, Ewert and Herding 1986a, b, 1989. ENDOR imaging was also studied for spin labeled compounds (Janzen and Kotake 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%