2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EPR study of Mn-implanted single crystal plates of TiO2 rutile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the other phases discussed, the rutile phase of TiO 2 has an axially elongated Ti site with D 2 h symmetry caused by in-plane distortion of the equatorial oxide bond angles from 90°. This results in both significant axial and rhombic contribution to the zero-field splitting, D = −6858 × 10 –4 cm –1 and E = −1352 × 10 –4 cm –1 , respectively …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to the other phases discussed, the rutile phase of TiO 2 has an axially elongated Ti site with D 2 h symmetry caused by in-plane distortion of the equatorial oxide bond angles from 90°. This results in both significant axial and rhombic contribution to the zero-field splitting, D = −6858 × 10 –4 cm –1 and E = −1352 × 10 –4 cm –1 , respectively …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in both significant axial and rhombic contribution to the zero-field D = −6858 × 10 −4 cm −1 and E = −1352 × 10 −4 cm −1 , respectively. 44…”
Section: ■ Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Confusion between the CF (LF) and SH (ZFS) quantities, mainly the CF=ZFS confusion exemplifi ed by consideration of the two notions: the CF parameters (CFPs) and the ZFS parameters evidently as synonymous, occurs in recent EMR--related papers, e.g., [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]; for critical comments, see [14]. Apart from the problems and confusions identifi ed in the review on molecular magnets [16], serious forms of the CF=ZFS confusion occur also in the EMR and SMM/MNM related textbook [13].…”
Section: Summary Of Emr-related Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This notation explicitly indicates the CF ¼ZFS confusion, whereas no reference was provided [152] for the Q q k operators. The incorrect terminology naming explicitly the true ZFS and/ or the ZFS parameters as the 'CF interaction (effects)' and/or the CF parameters, respectively, may be found also in the recent EPR studies of the Gd 3 þ ions by Garcia et al [153] and the Fe 3 þ ions by Güler et al [154].…”
Section: Confusion Between the Cf (Lf) And Sh (Zfs) Quantities In Thementioning
confidence: 99%