1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.60.12155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EPR linewidths inLa1xCaxMnO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

11
115
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
11
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimated DM parameters are presented in table 2. The absolute value of the DM vector for Mn-O-Mn along the c-axis is about 0.069 meV, which is in good agreement with experimental value of 0.086 meV from the ESR measurement [33]. The ratio of D/J = 0.049 along the c-axis is also reasonable in view of the experimental value of D/J ∼ 0.045, which is estimated from the weak ferromagnetic moment of 0.18µ B /Mn in the A-type LaMnO 3 [34].…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Estimated DM parameters are presented in table 2. The absolute value of the DM vector for Mn-O-Mn along the c-axis is about 0.069 meV, which is in good agreement with experimental value of 0.086 meV from the ESR measurement [33]. The ratio of D/J = 0.049 along the c-axis is also reasonable in view of the experimental value of D/J ∼ 0.045, which is estimated from the weak ferromagnetic moment of 0.18µ B /Mn in the A-type LaMnO 3 [34].…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…As shown in figure 5 the behaviour is quite different. For x = 0, T N is much lower than Θ due to the competition between first and second neighbour interactions [19]. For low doping, T mo is slightly depressed with x while the AFM-like Θ tends rapidly to zero, becomes FM-like, and reaches Θ = 180 K for x = 0.25.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…whereJ D = J 2 leg + 2J 2 rung mean an average exchange integral, 30 and angular dependence is determined by the transformation for DM vector…”
Section: 30mentioning
confidence: 99%