2013
DOI: 10.1109/tasl.2013.2273717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epoch Extraction Based on Integrated Linear Prediction Residual Using Plosion Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DPI algorithm used here for epoch extraction is shown to place the epochs accurately at instants of significant excitation for voiced phones and at random locations for unvoiced phones. 15 The DPI algorithm has been shown to be temporally very accurate up to 0.25 ms of the true epochs. 15 However since the value of the WIP depends largely on the temporal alignment of the vectors, the error made by the epoch extraction algorithm may affect the value of WIP even when the vectors are "similar."…”
Section: Maximum Weighted Inner-product (Mwip)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The DPI algorithm used here for epoch extraction is shown to place the epochs accurately at instants of significant excitation for voiced phones and at random locations for unvoiced phones. 15 The DPI algorithm has been shown to be temporally very accurate up to 0.25 ms of the true epochs. 15 However since the value of the WIP depends largely on the temporal alignment of the vectors, the error made by the epoch extraction algorithm may affect the value of WIP even when the vectors are "similar."…”
Section: Maximum Weighted Inner-product (Mwip)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…the ground truth) after adjusting larynx-to-microphone delay of 0.7 ms for CMU DB [4]. Algorithms were evaluated in the voiced regions with voicedunvoiced decision made by applying threshold of 1/9 on maximum negative value of DEGG [12]. MOCHA speech and DEGG files were already synchronized and voicing decision was made by applying threshold of 1/6 on maximum positive value of DEGG after passing through 15-point moving average (MA) filter.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All utterances were resampled at 32 kHz. Table 2 compares the performance of the proposed GCI estimation method on clean speech with three state-of-the art methods, DPI [12], SEDREAMS [10], ZFR [4] and our recently proposed FBA [11]. The evaluation was carried on 7 speakers In addition, performance of the proposed algorithm was studied on the degraded speech signals, for its robustness against noise, at various Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) levels.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations