EPMA analysis of a stalagmite from Küpeli Cave, southern Turkey: implications on detrital sediments

Palvanov, Muhammetmyrat; Eren, Muhsin; Kadir, Selahattin

doi:10.1007/s13146-023-00915-4

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of the intergranular pores observed under the microscope were residual intergranular pores, some of which are filled with authigenic illite, which shows unevenly foliated grains with irregular grain boundaries under the microscope [30] (Figure 6a), and some of these intergranular pores are filled with pyrite, surrounded by calcite (Figure 6b). Under the microscope, the pyrite mainly appears framboidal and spherical [31] and the calcite crystals mainly appear rhombohedra [32]. Dissolved pores are secondary pores formed via the dissolution of fragmented particles.…”

Section: Pore and Permeability Characterizations Of Limestone Samplesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Grain Size Effects on Porosity, Permeability, and Pore Size Distribution of Carbonate Rocks Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Technology

Wang,

Chang,

Wang

et al. 2024

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Core analysis is an accurate and direct method for finding the physical properties of oil and natural gas reservoirs. However, in some cases coring is time consuming and difficult, and only cuttings with the drilling fluid can be obtained. It is important to determine whether cuttings can adequately represent formation properties such as porosity, permeability, and pore size distribution (PSD). In this study, seven limestone samples with different sizes were selected (Cubes: 4 × 4 × 4 cm, 4 × 4 × 2 cm, 4 × 2 × 2 cm and 2 × 2 × 2 cm, Core: diameter of 2.5 cm and a length of 5 cm, Cuttings: 1–1.7 mm and 4.7–6.75 mm in diameter), and low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements were performed on these samples to obtain porosity, PSD, and permeability. The results showed that the porosity of cubes and cuttings with different sizes are consistent with cores, which is about 1%. Whereas the PSDs and permeabilities of the two cutting samples (less than in size 6.75 mm) differ significantly within cores. It is suggested that interparticle voids and mechanical pulverization during sample preparation have a negligible effect on porosity and a larger effect on PSD and permeability. Combined with factors such as wellbore collapse and mud contamination suffered in the field, it is not recommended to use cuttings with a particle size of less than 6.75 mm to characterize actual extra-low porosity and extra-low permeability formation properties.

show abstract

Section: Pore and Permeability Characterizations Of Limestone Samplesmentioning

confidence: 99%