2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epitopes as characterized by antibody-verified eplet mismatches determine risk of kidney transplant loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
49
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There was substantial heterogeneity with respect to the immunosuppressive protocols used; this was to some extent related to the multi-center nature of this study. Our eplet mismatch data (primarily associated with HLA-DRB1,3,4,5, and DQB1) were comparable to findings from previous reports (12,16,17,19,25,26,34), although class I DSAs were not considered in this analysis. We calculated PIRCHE score based on typing information of recipient HLA-DRB1,3,4,5, DQA1, and DQB1 as the presenting HLA class II molecules; the addition of DRB3,4,5, and DQA1/DQB1 explains why our PIRCHE scores were higher in range than those included in previous reports that were based on DRB1 alone (21,34,35), even though we did not consider HLA-C among the donorderived peptides.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There was substantial heterogeneity with respect to the immunosuppressive protocols used; this was to some extent related to the multi-center nature of this study. Our eplet mismatch data (primarily associated with HLA-DRB1,3,4,5, and DQB1) were comparable to findings from previous reports (12,16,17,19,25,26,34), although class I DSAs were not considered in this analysis. We calculated PIRCHE score based on typing information of recipient HLA-DRB1,3,4,5, DQA1, and DQB1 as the presenting HLA class II molecules; the addition of DRB3,4,5, and DQA1/DQB1 explains why our PIRCHE scores were higher in range than those included in previous reports that were based on DRB1 alone (21,34,35), even though we did not consider HLA-C among the donorderived peptides.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We found that analyses of both B cell and T cell epitopes (i.e., eplet mismatches and PIRCHE scores, respectively), had positive predictive capabilities with respect to de novo DSA production. Recent studies reported strong associations of eplet mismatch and/or PIRCHE-II scores with de novo DSA production or graft outcomes (25,26,34,35), whereas it was also reported that allelic and epitope mismatch analysis presented no additional value with respect to risk management (36). Differences in immunogenicity might be dependent on the nature of the eplet and the precise mismatch position (37,38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, increasing data suggests that eplet compatibility at certain class II gene loci, particularly HLA-DRB1/3/4/5 and DQB1 is of primary importance in minimizing graft injury 11,12,20 , reflecting the frequent occurrence of antibodies to these gene products in AMR [27][28][29] . Our studies (R.S-P) utilizing the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) confirm this understanding, documenting an increased risk of transplant glomerulopathy and death-censored graft failure in donor/recipient pairs mismatched at these loci 30 . The data reported here demonstrate that the probability of identity at these class II loci is substantially higher than for the full epitype, ranging from 30% at HLA-DRB1/3/4/5 + DQB1 to 79% at DQB1 alone, so providing a logistical basis for deliberate matching at these loci.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For HLA class I, the results clearly showed that Abverified eplet mismatches predicted transplant glomerulopathy and graft failure. 7 On a population level, the eplet load (ie, sum of mismatched eplets in donor-recipient constellations) is associated with the degree of DSA formation. 8,9 However, the clinical utility of immunological risk assessment based on eplet load for an individual patient is restricted, since not all eplets are generating a similar immune response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%