2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3624773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epitaxial TiN(001) wetting layer for growth of thin single-crystal Cu(001)

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inEpitaxial Ag(001) grown on MgO(001) and TiN(001): Twinning, surface morphology, and electron surface scattering J. Appl. Phys. 111, 043708 (2012); 10.1063/1.3684976Reactive magnetron cosputtering of hard and conductive ternary nitride thin films: Ti-Zr-N and Ti-Ta-N Single-crystal Cu(001) layers, 4-1400 nm thick, were deposited on MgO(001) with and without a 2.5-nm-thick TiN(001) buffer layer. X-ray diffraction and reflection indicate that the TiN(001) surface suppresses Cu-dew… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(35 reference statements)
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data for the latter has already been reported in Ref. 38, where we have shown that the wetting of Cu on TiN(001) yields a 4 Â higher crystalline quality and a 9 Â lower surface roughness than for Cu grown on MgO(001), similar to the Ag results in this study. The plotted q in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The data for the latter has already been reported in Ref. 38, where we have shown that the wetting of Cu on TiN(001) yields a 4 Â higher crystalline quality and a 9 Â lower surface roughness than for Cu grown on MgO(001), similar to the Ag results in this study. The plotted q in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…6 scattered electron wave. 38 Fitting of the data points provides values for p 1 of 0.6 6 0.2 and 0.8 6 0.1 at the Cu-vacuum and Ag-vacuum boundaries, respectively. The smaller p 1 value for the Cu-vacuum boundary is primarily attributed to the $2Â larger atomic roughness of the Cu surface, as observed by the XRR measurements (not shown) for layers with d 55 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations