2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-017-1469-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epitaxial growth and magnetic properties of h-LuFeO3 thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiferroic materials have attracted a lot of attention because of their unique physical properties. Hexagonal LuFeO 3 is a prototypical example of a single-phase multiferroic compound, since it exhibits simultaneously ferroelectric and magnetic ordering at room temperature [1][2][3][4] . For the epitaxial growth of single-crystalline thin films of LuFeO 3 and other Lu-Fe-O phases pulsed-laser deposition (PLD) is frequently used [4][5][6][7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiferroic materials have attracted a lot of attention because of their unique physical properties. Hexagonal LuFeO 3 is a prototypical example of a single-phase multiferroic compound, since it exhibits simultaneously ferroelectric and magnetic ordering at room temperature [1][2][3][4] . For the epitaxial growth of single-crystalline thin films of LuFeO 3 and other Lu-Fe-O phases pulsed-laser deposition (PLD) is frequently used [4][5][6][7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epitaxial h-RFeO 3 thin films have been deposited on various substrates including Al 2 O 3 (0001), yttrium-stabilized zirconium oxide (YSZ) (111), and Al 2 O 3 (0001) buffered with Pt (111) layers [6][7][8][9]. All the epitaxial growth occurs along the c-axis of h-RFeO 3 in order to satisfy the triangular symmetry matching and to maximize the effect of interface energy with the goal to stabilize the hexagonal phase in the grown thin film.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epitaxial orientation is determined by the minimum free energy, which is related to the bonding across the substrate-epilayer interface and to the mismatch of the substrate and layer lattices. It is recognized that, despite the triangular symmetry matching on the abovementioned substrates, there is no obvious lattice match between h-RFeO 3 and Al 2 O 3 (0001) (a = 4.7602 Å), yttrium-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) (111) (a = 7.30 Å), or Pt (111) (a = 5.548 Å) [10].Nevertheless, an epitaxial growth of h-LuFeO 3 (LFO) could be obtained using the pulsed-laser deposition [6][7][8][9]11]. This means that the azimuthal epitaxial orientation of h-LuFeO 3 films cannot be explained simply by the lattice mismatch.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations