This paper investigates the interrelationship between states and families. At different levels of organization, both play a large role in shaping the context in which individuals live their lives. Yet when it comes to understanding key demographic events in the ancient Mediterranean world -birth, marriage, migration, family structures, and death -they are hardly brought together. In this paper, I argue that Greek and Roman demographic patterns were tightly connected with their own specific political-institutional frameworks that developed over the course of (city-)state formation processes. This interaction was shaped in particular by the emergence of diverging notions of citizenship in the Greek and the Roman world, which went hand in hand with the installment of disparate incentives and disincentives to certain demographic behaviors. Differing citizenship criteria, in other words, invoked different demographic behaviors. A 'political demography' perspective, therefore, helps us understand how and why Greek and Roman individuals selected their marriage candidates on different criteria, and sheds light on divergences in their respective emphases on extended family ties.
Marriage patterns in the Greco-Roman world102 See e.g. Lee and Ngai-ming (2006). 103 See Van der Kroef (2004), p. 93f. In the early 1960s, around 170.000 families still were forced to share housing with others, upon which the lack of opportunity to establish a nuclear household was declared 'volksvijand no.1' (the biggest enemy of the people) and top priority by the central government. 104 The distribution of metics over Attica was studied by Whitehead (1986), p. 83-4, who established that most of them lived in urban and suburban demes of Athens, including the Piraeus, and only very few in the inland demes, which were dominated by agriculture. This ties in well with the legal restrictions on property ownership.