Epistemological challenges in contemporary Western healthcare systems exemplified by people’s widespread use of complementary and alternative medicine

Abstract

Modern Western public healthcare systems offer predominantly publicly subsidized healthcare traditionally based on biomedicine as the most important basis to cure persons who suffer from disorders of somatic or psychiatric nature. To which extent this epistemological position is suitable for this purpose is under scientific debate and challenged by some people's personal understandings of health and illness, their individual illness experiences and their decision-making. Current studies show decreasing levels of patient trust in Western public healthcare and a widespread patient-initiated use of complementary and alternative medicine which is often linked to unmet patient-defined healthcare needs. Patients'/complementary and alternative medicine users' understandings of their afflictions are often based on elements of biomedical knowledge as well as embodied and experience-based knowledge. We believe this points to the need for a phenomenologically and socially based understanding of health and illness. In this article, we analyze challenges in contemporary healthcare systems, exemplified by people's widespread use of complementary and alternative medicine and based on three ways of understanding and relating to unhealth: disease (the biomedical perspective), illness (the phenomenological perspective), and sickness (the social perspective). In public healthcare systems aiming at involving patients in treatment processes, acknowledging the coexistence of differing epistemologies may be of great importance to define and reach goals of treatment and compliance.

Women's experiences along the ovarian cancer diagnostic pathway in Catalonia: A qualitative study

“…Several studies have examined the use of alternative/complementary medicines 44 . For one woman in our study, the use of these treatments was related to the normalization of symptoms and her consequent desire to self‐manage, while another questioned the appropriateness of biomedical treatments and the authority of the doctor to control her health.…”

A conceptual framework for psychosocial health management grounded in the therapeutic merits of indigenous KhoiSan health dialogues

“…Following this lack of recognition and support by means of policies, Africans have had to adopt western healthcare systems. However, Salamonsen and Ahlzén ( 2018 ), Malokoane et al ( 2020 ) and Rispel ( 2016 ) argue that a wide range of states across the world have adopted and implemented western health systems with ineffective outcomes and increasing levels of patient distrust. These authors further contend that many western health systems in Africa are under-funded, under-researched and under-resourced, leading these mechanisms into struggling to cope with the cumulative burden of diseases (Malokoane et al 2020 ).…”

Factores que afectan a la credibilidad en el sistema sanitario occidental y las decisiones en el tratamiento de la salud. Una revisión de la literatura = Factors that affect credibility in the western health system and decisions in the treatment of health. A review of literature

“…Muchas aseguran que la CAM proporciona un entorno terapéutico más positivo, más humano y empático. En este sentido, sus justificaciones se alinean sobre el déficit de la medicina occidental en lo referente al trato humano, para dar un sistema de atención de la salud eficaz y satisfactorio (Nadia Corp , J. L. Jordan, 2018;Salamonsen & Ahlzén, 2018).…”