2014
DOI: 10.5195/dpj.2014.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epistemological Approaches to Dialogic Teaching in a Conventional Setting - Critical Review

Abstract: Book review for Dialogic Pedagogy Journal: This is a review of the book 'Inspiring dialogue: Talking to learn in the English classroom' by Juzwik et al. (2013), New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 162 pages, $ 32 (paper). The review looks critically at the theoretical framework of the book and compares it to the ontological tradition of Baktinian dialogue. The review aims to find the strengths of the book and meanwhile exposes its weaknesses in light of the interpretation of the Bakhtin's circle and modern B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…En conclusión, el concepto de CPA en este estudio, significa una comunidad en la que los maestros exploran y mejoran continuamente, todas las áreas de las actividades de enseñanza-aprendizaje mediante el aprendizaje activo y la cooperación con sus colegas, con el fin de lograr el crecimiento de los estudiantes y la promoción del aprendizaje (Elkader, 2014y Robin, 2004.…”
Section: Comunidad Profesional De Aprendizajeunclassified
“…En conclusión, el concepto de CPA en este estudio, significa una comunidad en la que los maestros exploran y mejoran continuamente, todas las áreas de las actividades de enseñanza-aprendizaje mediante el aprendizaje activo y la cooperación con sus colegas, con el fin de lograr el crecimiento de los estudiantes y la promoción del aprendizaje (Elkader, 2014y Robin, 2004.…”
Section: Comunidad Profesional De Aprendizajeunclassified
“…Teachers in this study used dialogic pedagogies to help them understand their students' cultural background of science, which in turn helped them to know how to manage and respond to the students' voices in a way to make the students focus on learning the school science and achieve their learning targets (Meyer & Crawford, 2011. In this sense, teachers use these dialogic pedagogies as a 'bridge' tool or 'scaffold' tool, also called 'teacher-led dialogues' (Abd Elkader, 2014;Scott, Aguiar, Mortimer, 2006;Skidmore, 2006), to find a sensible way to avoid confronting the students' cultural diversity but get them focus on school science. This view of school science, science teaching and science learning constrains the effectiveness these dialogic pedagogies can offer to respond to the students' cultural diversity and use these cultural differences as part of the pedagogy that can help students learn about the nature of science (Alexander, 2004;Brown, Boda, Lemmi, & Monroe, 2018;Richards, 2019).…”
Section: Teachers' Use Of the Dialogic Pedagogy For The School Science Agenda But Not For The Diversity Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%