2018
DOI: 10.4995/rlyla.2018.7801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epistemic modals in early Modern English history texts. Analysis of gender variation

Abstract: <p>In the present study, samples of late Modern English scientific texts have been analysed to evaluate cases of epistemic modality as realised by modal verbs. The aim of this research was to detect if there exist variances in the way modals are used in historical texts from a gender perspective. For this, I have interrogated the Corpus History English Texts (1700-1900) which is part of The Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Texts, which contains history texts written by male and female authors. I have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Borrowing Zhang's (2015) notion of elasticity and related categories, Quintana-Toledo (2017) explores vague language in another subcorpus of the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing, namely, the Corpus of History English Texts. Finally, hedging may well be the most extensively researched pragmatic function of vagueness from a diachronic perspective, notably in the works by Salager-Meyer, Defives & Hamelinsck (1996), Skelton (1997), Salager-Meyer & Defives (1998, Alonso-Almeida (2012), Puente-Castelo & Mónaco (2016), Álvarez-Gil (2018a2018b), Álvarez-Gil & García-Alonso (2019 or Moskowich & Crespo (2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borrowing Zhang's (2015) notion of elasticity and related categories, Quintana-Toledo (2017) explores vague language in another subcorpus of the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing, namely, the Corpus of History English Texts. Finally, hedging may well be the most extensively researched pragmatic function of vagueness from a diachronic perspective, notably in the works by Salager-Meyer, Defives & Hamelinsck (1996), Skelton (1997), Salager-Meyer & Defives (1998, Alonso-Almeida (2012), Puente-Castelo & Mónaco (2016), Álvarez-Gil (2018a2018b), Álvarez-Gil & García-Alonso (2019 or Moskowich & Crespo (2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aunque todavía queda mucho por investigar en textos académicos desde una perspectiva diacrónica, hay algunos estudios previos sobre elementos de posicionamiento realizados en el ámbito de la pragmática histórica (cf. Gray, Biber y Hiltunen 2011; Moskowich and Crespo 2014;Alonso-Almeida 2015;Álvarez-Gil, 2017Álvarez-Gil, , 2018Álvarez-Gil, , 2019. Siguiendo esta tradición, nos centramos en la expresión I think, siguiendo el trabajo de van der Auwera y Plungian (1998) para la descripción de la modalidad y los tipos modales.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…El estudio de los verbos modales, y de la modalidad en general, en textos de especialidad no es realmente novedosa, como se demuestra en la literatura existente (cf. Giltrow 2005;Efstathiadi 2010;Cheng & Cheng 2014;Alonso-Almeida 2014;Ge 2015;Carrió-Pastor 2017;Álvarez-Gil 2018;Carrió-Pastor 2020a). La novedad de este estudio radica principalmente en la selección de dos secciones fundamentales del artículo de investigación para la recepción y el impacto de este como aportación científica, como son la introducción y la conclusión, y mi interés por los textos turísticos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified