2019
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epistatic effect of TLR3 and cGAS‐STING‐IKKε‐TBK1‐IFN signaling variants on colorectal cancer risk

Abstract: Objective The TLR3/cGAS‐STING‐IFN signaling has recently been reported to be disturbed in colorectal cancer due to deregulated expression of the genes involved. Our study aimed to investigate the influence of potential regulatory variants in these genes on the risk of sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) in a Czech cohort of 1424 CRC patients and 1114 healthy controls. Methods The variants in the TLR3, CGAS, TMEM173, IKBKE, and TBK1 genes were selected using various online bioinformatic tools, such as UCSC browser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the data also showed that HFD increased TLR3 by 20-fold as indicated by the total count, it had a discrepancy with the FPKM read count that showed HFD increased TLR3 by 38-fold. Furthermore, the null expression of TLR3 in CRC was not in agreement with other published studies [ 21 , 22 ]. Therefore, we shortlisted TLR4 for the study and further validated its expressions in the tumor tissues by qPCR.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Although the data also showed that HFD increased TLR3 by 20-fold as indicated by the total count, it had a discrepancy with the FPKM read count that showed HFD increased TLR3 by 38-fold. Furthermore, the null expression of TLR3 in CRC was not in agreement with other published studies [ 21 , 22 ]. Therefore, we shortlisted TLR4 for the study and further validated its expressions in the tumor tissues by qPCR.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Recently, several studies demonstrated that the STING pathway had tremendous potential for immunotherapy (Chon et al, 2019;Su et al, 2019;Catalano et al, 2020). Its conformational changes and phosphorylation result in its translocation from the ER to distinct perinuclear endosomes near the Golgi (Bai and Liu, 2019;Chon et al, 2019;Yang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[94][95][96] The expression of genes in cGAS-STING signaling pathway could be affected by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the SNPs may lead to colorectal cancer susceptibility (Table 2). 97 In addition, hypermethylation within the cGAS promoter region may partly account for the suppressed expression of cGAS in CA cells. 94 Notably, high STING expression, particularly in endothelial, was regarded as an independent prognostic factor for better overall survival in colorectal cancer patients.…”
Section: Colorectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 94–96 The expression of genes in cGAS–STING signaling pathway could be affected by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the SNPs may lead to colorectal cancer susceptibility (Table 2). 97 In addition, hypermethylation within the cGAS promoter region may partly account for the suppressed expression of cGAS in CA cells 94 98–100 …”
Section: The Cgas–sting Signaling Pathway In Gi Cancersmentioning
confidence: 99%