1987
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.7.3.1276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Episomal maintenance of a bovine papilloma virus vector in transgenic mice.

Abstract: We have used a bovine papillomavirus-based vector to generate transgenic mice. Transgenic mice result from either pronuclear or cytoplasmic injections of the vector into fertilized eggs. Of 30 mice generated by microinjection, 27 (90%) contained the vector in its episomal form, at less than one copy per cell. This represents a highly efficient means of gene transfer in which the transgene is in a controlled genetic environment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The production of extrachromosomal structures and their propagation to the next generation have been reported in transgenic animals obtained by SMGT in mammals (Kuznetsov et al, 2000), birds (Rottmann et al, 1992), fish (Khoo et al, 1992), and insects (Robinson et al, 2000) and also, in some cases, by DNA microinjection in mammals (Kiessling et al, 1986;Elbrecht et al, 1987), amphibia (Etkin and Pearman, 1987), fish (Culp et al, 1991), nematodes (Mello et al, 1991), and insects (Nikolaev et al, 1993). A significant implication of the present work for SMGT experiments is that the rate of positive animals may be found to vary over time, and in particular may be higher among younger animals, while progressively decreasing among older ones; in other words, animals that were positive in an early screening may be classified as negative upon subsequent analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production of extrachromosomal structures and their propagation to the next generation have been reported in transgenic animals obtained by SMGT in mammals (Kuznetsov et al, 2000), birds (Rottmann et al, 1992), fish (Khoo et al, 1992), and insects (Robinson et al, 2000) and also, in some cases, by DNA microinjection in mammals (Kiessling et al, 1986;Elbrecht et al, 1987), amphibia (Etkin and Pearman, 1987), fish (Culp et al, 1991), nematodes (Mello et al, 1991), and insects (Nikolaev et al, 1993). A significant implication of the present work for SMGT experiments is that the rate of positive animals may be found to vary over time, and in particular may be higher among younger animals, while progressively decreasing among older ones; in other words, animals that were positive in an early screening may be classified as negative upon subsequent analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, transgenic sequences can generate extrachromosomal structures that are transmitted to the next generation, as documented in studies of transgenic mammals, (62,98) birds, (21) fish (19) and insects (56) obtained by SMGTand, in certain cases, by DNA microinjection. (99,100) The genesis of such extrachromosomal structures in transgenic animals, and their sexual transmission to the progeny, are unclear. According to the model, transgenic episomal DNA is thought to represent the product of an endogenous RT activity.…”
Section: Endogenous Reverse Transcriptase Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation is that in the male the foreign DNA is present as an episome. Episomal maintenance has already been Transgenics after lipid transfection 213 described on some rare occasions (Rassoulzadegan et al, 1986;Elbrecht et al, 1987). We are more inclined, though, to accept that it is integrated, but in such a small number of cells that its visualisation is very difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%