2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2007.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epipolar geometry estimation based on evolutionary agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the fact that it reduces the number of potential inliers by thresholding the proposal probabilities that are, themselves, dependent on the robust estimation of normalized residuals. Several studies have attempted to apply evolutionary algorithms instead of the random search [29,30]. Although promising results were achieved, several limitations were not addressed yet.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the fact that it reduces the number of potential inliers by thresholding the proposal probabilities that are, themselves, dependent on the robust estimation of normalized residuals. Several studies have attempted to apply evolutionary algorithms instead of the random search [29,30]. Although promising results were achieved, several limitations were not addressed yet.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies a large number of linear or iterative estimations, but on a limited number of correspondences. Following (Hu et al, 2008) the best known robust methods are LMedS (Least Median of Squares) (Zhang, 1998), RANSAC (RANdom SAmple Consensus) (Torr & Murray, 1997), MLESAC (Maximum Likelihood Estimation SAmple Consensus) (Torr & Zisserman, 2000) and MAPSAC (Maximum A Posteriori SAmple Consensus) (Torr, 2002). LMedS and RANSAC randomly sample some subset of seven matching points in order to estimate, with a linear approach, the model parameters and use additional statistical methods to derive a minimal number of samples needed since all possible subset can not be considered to save time; the difference between the two is the technique used to determine the best result: on one side the median distance between points and epipolar lines on the other the number of inliers.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides these classical algorithms, more recently a philosophically different approach has been proposed. Several authors (Chai & De Ma, 1998;Hu et al, 2002;2008) have employed a genetic computing paradigm to estimate epipolar geometry. The main idea is to employ an evolutionary approach in order to choose, among the available correspondences, the optimal, or sub-optimal, set of eight points by which the epipolar geometry estimation can be carried out with minimal error.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EAs are a stochastic search method which is inspired by natural selection and the principles of evolution [12,13]. EAs have received a great deal of attention in the recent past and are widely used in diverse areas of image processing [3,6,17,18,21,22]. This paper is organized as follows: In section 2, we briefly describe the background of epipolar geometry which is used for the calibration methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%