2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2010.00418.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epiphytes and associated fauna on the brown alga Fucus vesiculosus in the Baltic and the North Seas in relation to different abiotic and biotic variables

Abstract: Fucus vesiculosus L. is an important habitat‐forming macroalga both in the saline and high diverse North Sea and the diluted and low diversity Baltic Sea. Despite its importance, comparisons of the spatial patterns of its epiphytes have rarely been reported. In this study we examined the species composition and density of macro‐epiphytes and mobile fauna on the canopy‐forming macroalga F. vesiculosus inhabiting different regimes of wave exposure in the North and Baltic Seas. The North and Baltic Seas had disti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Grazers may facilitate macroalgal growth either by removing fouling epiphytes or by increasing the concentration of available nutrients (Guidone et al 2012). The context-dependency of facilitation in our study may be explained by the more pronounced effect of grazers on nutrient concentrations at elevated temperatures (Werner and Matthiessen 2013) or the greater potential for grazing to alleviate the growth-inhibiting effects of heavier epiphytic loads that develop under conditions of reduced wave action and warming (Kersen et al 2011). The apparent disruptive effect of wave action on warming-induced positive species interactions is another means by which altered environmental conditions can modify the effects of consumer diversity change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Grazers may facilitate macroalgal growth either by removing fouling epiphytes or by increasing the concentration of available nutrients (Guidone et al 2012). The context-dependency of facilitation in our study may be explained by the more pronounced effect of grazers on nutrient concentrations at elevated temperatures (Werner and Matthiessen 2013) or the greater potential for grazing to alleviate the growth-inhibiting effects of heavier epiphytic loads that develop under conditions of reduced wave action and warming (Kersen et al 2011). The apparent disruptive effect of wave action on warming-induced positive species interactions is another means by which altered environmental conditions can modify the effects of consumer diversity change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…These large, perennial, canopy-forming macroalgae represent three-dimensional habitats harbouring numerous species of epibionts, sub-canopy flora and associated motile fauna, including juvenile fish (e.g. Thompson et al 1996, Kersen et al 2011, Ronnback et al 2007). They contribute substantially to water quality by the fixation of nutrients and carbon, by the provision of oxygen, and by buffering environmental stress (e.g.…”
Section: Regional Examples Of Stress Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, these literatures focused on the epiphytic macroalgal species (Rindi and Guiry, 2004;Muñoz and Fotedar, 2009;Kersen et al, 2011), whereas very few literatures dealt with epiphytic microalgae and/or epifauna. Tanaka et al (1984) conducted a study on epiphytic microalgal communities on Sargassum piluriferum and artificial seagrasses in Sargassum bed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%