2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epineurial Window Is More Efficient in Attracting Axons than Simple Coaptation in a Sutureless (Cyanoacrylate-Bound) Model of End-to-Side Nerve Repair in the Rat Upper Limb: Functional and Morphometric Evidences and Review of the Literature

Abstract: End-to-side nerve coaptation brings regenerating axons from the donor to the recipient nerve. Several techniques have been used to perform coaptation: microsurgical sutures with and without opening a window into the epi(peri)neurial connective tissue; among these, window techniques have been proven more effective in inducing axonal regeneration. The authors developed a sutureless model of end-to-side coaptation in the rat upper limb. In 19 adult Wistar rats, the median and the ulnar nerves of the left arm were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the number of regenerating myelinated nerve fibers in group ETS was approximately 70% of that in group ETE, and only 40% of the intact controls at the end of the study. This finding is largely in line with a study conducted by Papalia et al, 21 where less than 45% of the original axons were retained in the recipient nerve following ETS neurorrhaphy in the rat upper limb. Furthermore, there was an even larger gap on the number of labeled neurons giving regenerating axons between group ETE and group ETS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the number of regenerating myelinated nerve fibers in group ETS was approximately 70% of that in group ETE, and only 40% of the intact controls at the end of the study. This finding is largely in line with a study conducted by Papalia et al, 21 where less than 45% of the original axons were retained in the recipient nerve following ETS neurorrhaphy in the rat upper limb. Furthermore, there was an even larger gap on the number of labeled neurons giving regenerating axons between group ETE and group ETS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although regenerating axons are able to penetrate the epineurium and perineurium of the donor nerves, connective tissue sheath of the nerve does pose an obstacle to axon sprouting after ETS neurorrhaphy, 23 and research increasingly suggests that axonal damage in the donor nerve may provide a significant positive stimulus to axon sprouting. 11,21,[24][25][26] Therefore, it can reasonably be expected that ETS neurorrhaphy with deliberate injury in the donor hypoglossal nerve may result in larger numbers of regenerating fibers and better functional outcomes. It is worth mentioning that both the reconstruction techniques resulted in partial functional recovery at different levels, but no complete restoration of function was obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, end‐to‐side coaptation could produce axon migration from the donor to the recipient nerve; moreover, it has been reported to be successful when applied to distal purely motor or sensate branches (Geuna et al, ; Papalia et al, ; Tos et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forelimb models have no contracture or autotomy that interferes in functional evaluation (Bertelli and Mira, 1995; Bontioti et al, 2003). Also, the grasping test is useful since the median nerve and finger flexor function can be easily assessed, furthermore, the grasping test is an objective and reliable method that allows researchers to track recovery progress during the repair process (Bertelli and Mira, 1995; Papalia et al, 2003, 2016; Ronchi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%