2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10474-006-0518-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epimorphisms and cowellpoweredness for separated metrically generated theories

Abstract: For metrically generated constructs X we give an internal characterization of the regular closure operator on X, determined by the subconstruct X 0 , consisting of its T 0 objects. This allows us to describe the epimorphisms in X 0 and to show that all the constructs of that type are cowellpowered. We capture many known results but our method also gives solutions in cases where the epimorphism problem was still open.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So we can conclude that for X = Lip the uniformly complete T 0 objects form a reflective subcategory with associated firm class consisting of those morphisms that are dense embeddings, where density is expressed in the underlying topology of the codomain. Applying Proposition 4.3.6 in [3] we can conclude that this class coincides with the class of all epimorphic embeddings. It follows that the uniformly complete objects are exactly those Lipschitz spaces which have a complete underlying uniformity.…”
Section: Proposition the Categorymentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So we can conclude that for X = Lip the uniformly complete T 0 objects form a reflective subcategory with associated firm class consisting of those morphisms that are dense embeddings, where density is expressed in the underlying topology of the codomain. Applying Proposition 4.3.6 in [3] we can conclude that this class coincides with the class of all epimorphic embeddings. It follows that the uniformly complete objects are exactly those Lipschitz spaces which have a complete underlying uniformity.…”
Section: Proposition the Categorymentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Base categories consisting of metric spaces are contained in C ∆,s , the construct of all metric spaces. We require that the base category C satisfies the following supplementary condition which was introduced in [3] and is fulfilled by all concrete examples of base categories just mentioned. C is closed for epimorphic embeddings in C ∆ i.e.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a similar way we now dene the symmetrization S A (X) of an approach space X with gauge D and distance δ to be the approach space X, ξ A (D * ) . It was proved in [7] that the distance of S A (X) equals δ ∨ δ ϕ −1 . Here, ϕ denotes the quasi-metrical coreection of X, which is given by ϕ = sup d∈D d. 5.6.…”
Section: Qug-spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], it was proved that for a T 0 approach space X, r is given by the topological coreection of S A (X). It is well-known that epimorphisms in Ap 0 are exactly the r-dense maps.…”
Section: Sobrication Of An Approach Space Via Bicompletionmentioning
confidence: 99%