2019
DOI: 10.1101/549550
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EpiMethylTag simultaneously detects ATAC-seq or ChIP-seq signals with DNA methylation

Abstract: Activation of regulatory elements is thought to be inversely correlated with DNA methylation levels. However, it is difficult to determine whether DNA methylation is compatible with chromatin accessibility or transcription factor (TF) binding if assays are performed separately. We developed a low input, low sequencing depth method, EpiMethylTag that combines ATAC-seq or ChIP-seq (M-ATAC or M-ChIP) with bisulfite conversion, to simultaneously examine accessibility/TF binding and methylation on the same DNA.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CUT&Tag-BS overcomes some of the limitations of existing methods. First, CUT&Tag-BS uses native cells without formaldehyde fixation thus avoiding the side effects of crosslinking/decrosslinking, as reflected by high bisulfite conversion efficiency (99.5%) and improved overall alignment rate in CUT&Tag-BS (~80%) (Figure 2A) compared with EpiMethylTag (~65%) and ChIP-BS-seq (~33%) (Lhoumaud et al, 2019). Second, CUT&Tag-BS adopts a tagmentation-based bisulfite sequencing library preparation strategy, which is faster and requires substantially less DNA than conventional ligation-based bisulfite sequencing library construction (Wang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CUT&Tag-BS overcomes some of the limitations of existing methods. First, CUT&Tag-BS uses native cells without formaldehyde fixation thus avoiding the side effects of crosslinking/decrosslinking, as reflected by high bisulfite conversion efficiency (99.5%) and improved overall alignment rate in CUT&Tag-BS (~80%) (Figure 2A) compared with EpiMethylTag (~65%) and ChIP-BS-seq (~33%) (Lhoumaud et al, 2019). Second, CUT&Tag-BS adopts a tagmentation-based bisulfite sequencing library preparation strategy, which is faster and requires substantially less DNA than conventional ligation-based bisulfite sequencing library construction (Wang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those two methods use a ligation-based bisulfite sequencing library preparation strategy, which requires a large amount of ChIP-ed DNA (~ 100 ng); thus, they are not suitable for low-input samples. To reduce the amount of ChIP-ed DNA required, EpiMethylTag (Lhoumaud et al, 2019) was developed recently using tagmentaion-based library preparation strategy instead. Despite the differences in library construction, the three methods all rely on crosslinked ChIP to capture chromatin fragments associated with protein of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%