2019
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2019.2939010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epileptic Focus Localization via Brain Network Analysis on Riemannian Manifolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the phase synchronization connectivity matrix is relatively simple, a more advanced and auto‐learning algorithmic model should also be applied. Regarding the multiple‐channel iEEG signals as matrices on a Riemannian manifold, Qi et al 73 successfully localized the SOZ by brain network connectivity analysis with an average area under the curve (AUC) score of 87.5%. Subsequently, Han et al constructed EEG segment as a brain functional network stacking into dynamic epileptic brain functional networks as the time axis for seizure prediction 54 .…”
Section: Computerized Application In Epileptic Eeg Analysis: Dynamica...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the phase synchronization connectivity matrix is relatively simple, a more advanced and auto‐learning algorithmic model should also be applied. Regarding the multiple‐channel iEEG signals as matrices on a Riemannian manifold, Qi et al 73 successfully localized the SOZ by brain network connectivity analysis with an average area under the curve (AUC) score of 87.5%. Subsequently, Han et al constructed EEG segment as a brain functional network stacking into dynamic epileptic brain functional networks as the time axis for seizure prediction 54 .…”
Section: Computerized Application In Epileptic Eeg Analysis: Dynamica...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the aforementioned Euclidean machine learning methods for emotion recognition are not directly suitable for handling EEG network connectivity matrices. Considering the Riemannian properties, prior studies have proposed knearest neighbor (kNN) methods [32] for classifying motor imagery (MI) [33], steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP) [34], and epileptic states [35] from EEG covariance or coherence matrices on Riemannian manifolds. However, using EEG network connectivity matrices to recognize emotional states on Riemannian manifolds has not been achieved so far (see section II for detailed explanation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, existing R-kNN methods have exclusively focused on real-valued EEG covariance and coherence matrices [31]- [35], which has limited ability to capture phase information in EEG functional networks. However, phase also contains critical information in EEG signals [38], [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In iBCI systems, neural decoding algorithm plays an important role. Many algorithms have been proposed to decode motor information from neural signals [5][6][7], including population vector [8], linear estimators [9], deep neural networks [10], recursive Bayesian decoders [11]. Among these approaches, Kalman filter is considered to provide more accurate trajectory estimation by incorporating the process of trajectory evolution as a prior knowledge [12], which has been successfully applied to online cursor and prosthetic control, achieving the state-of-the-art performance [5,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%