2024
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erae054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epigenetics and plant hormone dynamics: a functional and methodological perspective

Jiri Rudolf,
Lucia Tomovicova,
Klara Panzarova
et al.

Abstract: Plant hormones, pivotal regulators of plant growth, development, and response to environmental cues, have recently emerged as central modulators of epigenetic processes governing gene expression and phenotypic plasticity. This review addresses the complex interplay between plant hormones and epigenetic mechanisms, highlighting the diverse methodologies that have been harnessed to decipher these intricate relationships. We present a comprehensive overview to understand how phytohormones orchestrate epigenetic m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 306 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the DNA sequences (SSR loci and RRS data) between the maternal plant (CB) and the plant (EAS) derived from apomixis are identical (Felsenfeld 2014), there are several significant phenotypic differences noted between the two cultivars, including tree architecture and frequency of bract types, dimensions, and color expression (Table 2). These morphological differences are stable following multiple rounds of clonal propagation over 5 years at two commercial nurseries and thus may be attributed to epigenetics, which are associated with either physical or chemical modifications of DNA (Felsenfeld 2014) or regulation of gene expression (Villota-Salazar et al 2016) perhaps via growth regulators that can affect "gene expression and phenotypic plasticity" without affecting the DNA sequences (Rudolf et al 2024).…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the DNA sequences (SSR loci and RRS data) between the maternal plant (CB) and the plant (EAS) derived from apomixis are identical (Felsenfeld 2014), there are several significant phenotypic differences noted between the two cultivars, including tree architecture and frequency of bract types, dimensions, and color expression (Table 2). These morphological differences are stable following multiple rounds of clonal propagation over 5 years at two commercial nurseries and thus may be attributed to epigenetics, which are associated with either physical or chemical modifications of DNA (Felsenfeld 2014) or regulation of gene expression (Villota-Salazar et al 2016) perhaps via growth regulators that can affect "gene expression and phenotypic plasticity" without affecting the DNA sequences (Rudolf et al 2024).…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%