2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41437-021-00415-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epigenetic responses of hare barley (Hordeum murinum subsp. leporinum) to climate change: an experimental, trait-based approach

Abstract: The impact of reduced rainfall and increased temperatures forecasted by climate change models on plant communities will depend on the capacity of plant species to acclimate and adapt to new environmental conditions. The acclimation process is mainly driven by epigenetic regulation, including structural and chemical modifications on the genome that do not affect the nucleotide sequence. In plants, one of the best-known epigenetic mechanisms is cytosine-methylation. We evaluated the impact of 30% reduced rainfal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Climatic changes affect epigenetic variation in many organisms, which might help them adapt to rapid climatic changes (e.g., Gugger et al, 2016 ; Chano et al, 2021 ; reviewed in Thiebaut et al, 2019 ). In our study, however, experimental alteration of DNA methylation had inconsistent effects on the plant response to climate change in the three countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climatic changes affect epigenetic variation in many organisms, which might help them adapt to rapid climatic changes (e.g., Gugger et al, 2016 ; Chano et al, 2021 ; reviewed in Thiebaut et al, 2019 ). In our study, however, experimental alteration of DNA methylation had inconsistent effects on the plant response to climate change in the three countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associations between epigenotypes and phenotypes across individuals, populations or species have been frequently documented in recent years for model and non‐model plants, either in the wild or under experimental conditions (e.g. Amoah et al, 2012; Chano et al, 2021; Foust et al, 2016; Medrano et al, 2014; Paun et al, 2010; Róis et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2020; Wilschut et al, 2016). In contrast, similar epigenotype–phenotype associations across different homologous parts of the same plant individual remain basically unreported, and the few documented instances refer to discrete phenotypic variation in leaves or flowers (Bitonti et al, 1996; Herrera & Bazaga, 2013; Marfil et al, 2009; but see Alonso et al, 2018; Bian et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transgenerational epigenetics have been specially studied in the Arabidopsis model and some crop species (Hauser et al, 2011;Quadrana and Colot, 2016) but, to our knowledge, no studies linking its prevalence with different functional types of plants have been conducted. Further analysis including hormones quantification (Vu et al, 2015) or cytosine-methylation (Chano et al, 2021) would allow to better understand the underlying mechanisms that explain these opposite persistent maternal effects in species with contrasting functional strategies.…”
Section: Does Phenotypic Variability In the Response Of The Maternal ...mentioning
confidence: 99%