2018
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201700199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epigenetic Modifications of Cytosine: Biophysical Properties, Regulation, and Function in Mammalian DNA

Abstract: To decode the function and molecular recognition of several recently discovered cytosine derivatives in the human genome - 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, 5-formylcytosine, and 5-carboxylcytosine - a detailed understanding of their effects on the structural, chemical, and biophysical properties of DNA is essential. Here, we review recent literature in this area, with particular emphasis on features that have been proposed to enable the specific recognition of modified cytosine bases by DNA-binding proteins. These inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(271 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, TDG has high specificity for G·fC and G·caC pairs, binding these sites with ΔΔG bind of 2.5 kcal/mol and 2.9 kcal/mol, respectively, compared to nonspecific DNA (or ΔΔG bind of 1.6 kcal/mol and 2.0 kcal/mol relative to an unmodified CpG site). Because fC and caC impart only small, localized changes to DNA structure ( 64 , 65 ), the specificity of TDG for these sites is likely explained largely by specific interactions that it forms with the formyl and carboxyl groups, as observed in crystal structures ( 50 , 51 ). Although the affinity of TDG for G·hmC pairs has not been reported, evidence that TDG does not form specific interactions with the hydroxyl of hmC is provided by findings that the TDG catalytic domain (residues 111–308; TDG 111–308 ) lacks detectable affinity for G·hmC (or G·mC) pairs while it binds specifically to G·fC ( K d 130 nM) and G·caC ( K d 70 nM) pairs ( 50 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, TDG has high specificity for G·fC and G·caC pairs, binding these sites with ΔΔG bind of 2.5 kcal/mol and 2.9 kcal/mol, respectively, compared to nonspecific DNA (or ΔΔG bind of 1.6 kcal/mol and 2.0 kcal/mol relative to an unmodified CpG site). Because fC and caC impart only small, localized changes to DNA structure ( 64 , 65 ), the specificity of TDG for these sites is likely explained largely by specific interactions that it forms with the formyl and carboxyl groups, as observed in crystal structures ( 50 , 51 ). Although the affinity of TDG for G·hmC pairs has not been reported, evidence that TDG does not form specific interactions with the hydroxyl of hmC is provided by findings that the TDG catalytic domain (residues 111–308; TDG 111–308 ) lacks detectable affinity for G·hmC (or G·mC) pairs while it binds specifically to G·fC ( K d 130 nM) and G·caC ( K d 70 nM) pairs ( 50 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…exposures and interventions throughout life will counteract or amplify this risk in an incremental manner. In fact, there is preliminary evidence of the active reversibility of DNA methylation through various pathways not involving demethylases and which supports ongoing, active adaptation to environmental cues throughout life (reviewed in 51,52 ). If proven to have physiological relevance, the active reversibility of DNA methylation would disrupt the currently accepted view that DNA methylation is mostly irreversible and potentially force a revision of the "critical windows" concept.…”
Section: Figure 12 Comparison Of the Critical Windows Theory And Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CpG islands are CG-rich regions with a CG content over 50% and an expected to observed CG ratio over 60%, covering a distance of at least 200 bp [27,28], and are often enriched at promoter sites and 5’-untranslated regions [26,29]. In general, promoter hypermethylation results in condensed chromatin structures and hence reduced transcription rates [30], largely due to hindered transcription factor binding. In this study the transcription factor MAX was the main focus as the ACE promoter region contains a CpG island that harbors two MAX binding sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%