2019
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epigenetic dynamics during flowering plant reproduction: evidence for reprogramming?

Abstract: Summary Over the last 10 yr there have been major advances in documenting and understanding dynamic changes to DNA methylation, small RNAs, chromatin modifications and chromatin structure that accompany reproductive development in flowering plants, from germline specification to seed maturation. Here I highlight recent advances in the field, mostly made possible by microscopic analysis of epigenetic states or by the ability to isolate specific cell types or tissues and apply omics approaches. I consider in whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another striking insight from the 5mC divergence patterns is that the increase in D is particularly pronounced for context CG but appears to be low, or even absent, at CHG and CHH loci. Similar observations have previously led to the hypothesis that the inheritance of spontaneous epimutations may be restricted to CG dinucleotides [11,12], perhaps as a consequence of the preferential reinforcement of CHG and CHH methylation during sexual reproduction [38,39]. Using heuristic arguments, it had been further suggested that CG epimutations accumulate neutrally, at least at the level of individual cytosines, meaning that 5mC gains and loss in this context are under no selective constraints [12].…”
Section: Spontaneous Epimutations Accumulate Neutrally Over Generationsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Another striking insight from the 5mC divergence patterns is that the increase in D is particularly pronounced for context CG but appears to be low, or even absent, at CHG and CHH loci. Similar observations have previously led to the hypothesis that the inheritance of spontaneous epimutations may be restricted to CG dinucleotides [11,12], perhaps as a consequence of the preferential reinforcement of CHG and CHH methylation during sexual reproduction [38,39]. Using heuristic arguments, it had been further suggested that CG epimutations accumulate neutrally, at least at the level of individual cytosines, meaning that 5mC gains and loss in this context are under no selective constraints [12].…”
Section: Spontaneous Epimutations Accumulate Neutrally Over Generationsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Epigenetic regulatory processes which modify gene activity based on DNA methylation, histone modifications, and modulation of chromatin structure are involved in controlling diverse developmental and cell fate decisions. Epigenetic regulation is increasingly recognized to be important during plant germline development [129]. While long non-coding RNAs can act in modulating DNA methylation and histone modifications to regulate gene activity [130], future investigations are required to elucidate their specific importance during reproductive development in detail.…”
Section: Epigenetic Regulatory Pathways Are Involved In Regulation Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meiotic transmission of epigenetic markings resulting from environmental cues provides a mechanism through which plastic responses to the environment can be transmitted from one generation to the next (transgenerational plasticity [ 6 ]). While plant germline cells do undergo a number of rounds of epigenetic reprogramming prior to the formation of a new seed [ 7 ], it is clear that environmental conditions experienced by parents can alter phenotypes [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ], epigenetic profiles [ 4 , 10 , 12 , 13 ] and gene expression [ 14 , 15 , 16 ] in the next generation. Importantly, autocorrelation between offspring and parent environment can favor mechanisms that establish such patterns of transgenerational plasticity [ 17 , 18 ], perhaps leading to natural selection that either favors or disfavors this transmission depending on local environmental patterns [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%