Epigenetic drugs as new emerging therapeutics: What is the scale's orientation of application and challenges?

Farani, Marzieh Ramezani; Sarlak, Maryam; Gholami, Amir; Azaraian, Maryam; Binabaj, Maryam Moradi; Kakavandi, Sareh; Tambuwala, Murtaza M.; Taheriazam, Afshin; Hashemi, Mehrdad; Ghasemi, Sorayya

doi:10.1016/j.prp.2023.154688

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 280 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Such drugs have been proposed to be applied in conditions affecting bone [210], cancer [211,212], neurodegenerative disorders [213,214], cardiovascular conditions [215,216], and healthy aging [217]. The development of such "epi-drugs" is not without challenges [218], particularly since such interventions will have to be personalized for post-menopausal conditions that arise in different tissues, may not result from a single phenotypic pattern, and may occur in conjunction with multiple co-morbidities as the individual ages.…”

Section: Conclusion and The Way Forwardmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Heterogeneity of Post-Menopausal Disease Risk: Could the Basis for Why Only Subsets of Females Are Affected Be Due to a Reversible Epigenetic Modification System Associated with Puberty, Menstrual Cycles, Pregnancy and Lactation, and, Ultimately, Menopause?

Hart

2024

IJMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For much of human evolution, the average lifespan was <40 years, due in part to disease, infant mortality, predators, food insecurity, and, for females, complications of childbirth. Thus, for much of evolution, many females did not reach the age of menopause (45–50 years of age) and it is mainly in the past several hundred years that the lifespan has been extended to >75 years, primarily due to public health advances, medical interventions, antibiotics, and nutrition. Therefore, the underlying biological mechanisms responsible for disease risk following menopause must have evolved during the complex processes leading to Homo sapiens to serve functions in the pre-menopausal state. Furthermore, as a primary function for the survival of the species is effective reproduction, it is likely that most of the advantages of having such post-menopausal risks relate to reproduction and the ability to address environmental stresses. This opinion/perspective will be discussed in the context of how such post-menopausal risks could enhance reproduction, with improved survival of offspring, and perhaps why such risks are preserved. Not all post-menopausal females exhibit risk for this set of diseases, and those who do develop such diseases do not have all of the conditions. The diseases of the post-menopausal state do not operate as a unified complex, but as independent variables, with the potential for some overlap. The how and why there would be such heterogeneity if the risk factors serve essential functions during the reproductive years is also discussed and the concept of sets of reversible epigenetic changes associated with puberty, pregnancy, and lactation is offered to explain the observations regarding the distribution of post-menopausal conditions and their potential roles in reproduction. While the involvement of an epigenetic system with a dynamic “modification-demodification-remodification” paradigm contributing to disease risk is a hypothesis at this point, validation of it could lead to a better understanding of post-menopausal disease risk in the context of reproduction with commonalities may also lead to future improved interventions to control such risk after menopause.

show abstract

Section: Conclusion and The Way Forwardmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Heterogeneity of Post-Menopausal Disease Risk: Could the Basis for Why Only Subsets of Females Are Affected Be Due to a Reversible Epigenetic Modification System Associated with Puberty, Menstrual Cycles, Pregnancy and Lactation, and, Ultimately, Menopause?

Hart

2024

IJMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Gene-environment interaction in the pathophysiology of type 1 diabetes

Mittal,

Camick,

Lemos

et al. 2024

Front. Endocrinol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a complex metabolic autoimmune disorder that affects millions of individuals worldwide and often leads to significant comorbidities. However, the precise trigger of autoimmunity and disease onset remain incompletely elucidated. This integrative perspective article synthesizes the cumulative role of gene-environment interaction in the pathophysiology of T1D. Genetics plays a significant role in T1D susceptibility, particularly at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) locus and cathepsin H (CTSH) locus. In addition to genetics, environmental factors such as viral infections, pesticide exposure, and changes in the gut microbiome have been associated with the development of T1D. Alterations in the gut microbiome impact mucosal integrity and immune tolerance, increasing gut permeability through molecular mimicry and modulation of the gut immune system, thereby increasing the risk of T1D potentially through the induction of autoimmunity. HLA class II haplotypes with known effects on T1D incidence may directly correlate to changes in the gut microbiome, but precisely how the genes influence changes in the gut microbiome, and how these changes provoke T1D, requires further investigations. These gene-environment interactions are hypothesized to increase susceptibility to T1D through epigenetic changes such as DNA methylation and histone modification, which in turn modify gene expression. There is a need to determine the efficacy of new interventions that target these epigenetic modifications such as “epidrugs”, which will provide novel avenues for the effective management of T1D leading to improved quality of life of affected individuals and their families/caregivers.

show abstract