2010
DOI: 10.1089/cell.2009.0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epigenetic Differences between Embryonic Stem Cells Generated from Blastocysts DevelopedIn VitroandIn Vivo

Abstract: Embryonic stem (ES) cells constitute a very important tool for regenerative medicine today. These ES cells, and human ES cells in particular, are almost all derived from embryos obtained by in vitro fertilization (IVF) and from in vitro culture (IVC); however, such in vitro manipulated embryos often show abnormal genomic imprinting, which can lead to the development of various diseases. Nevertheless, several reports have evaluated ES cells derived from in vitro manipulated embryos. In this study, we establishe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In mouse and human ESCs, epigenetic status can be affected by in vitro culture [44]. Surprisingly, Horii et al reported that epigenetic modification can occur within as few as 5 passages, over which time differences in expression patterns between ESCs established from embryos produced via IVF and in ESCs from in vivo embryos can disappear [45]. In our study, it is possible that in vitro culture of the fESCs altered their epigenetic profile, resulting in expression characteristics that were comparable to control ESCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mouse and human ESCs, epigenetic status can be affected by in vitro culture [44]. Surprisingly, Horii et al reported that epigenetic modification can occur within as few as 5 passages, over which time differences in expression patterns between ESCs established from embryos produced via IVF and in ESCs from in vivo embryos can disappear [45]. In our study, it is possible that in vitro culture of the fESCs altered their epigenetic profile, resulting in expression characteristics that were comparable to control ESCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods used for generation of ES cell lines have been previously described [35,38]. Briefly, blastocysts were transferred into gelatinized tissue culture wells (2-3 blastocysts per well of a 4-well multiplate, Nunc, Rochester, NY, USA) and cultured for 7 days in ES medium and DMEM (Gibco, Gland Island, NY, USA) containing 17.5% Knockout SR (Gibco) following standard procedures [39,40].…”
Section: Generation Of Es Cell Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For densitometry, the Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the expression ratios of -exon 6/+exon 6 (-exon 5/+exon 5) were calculated. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR for Dnmt3b was also carried out as previously reported [38]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a suboptimal culture medium can cause aberrant genomic imprinting of the Snrpn and H19 gene, whereas embryos cultured in potassium simplex optimized medium with added amino acids (KSOMAA) show global gene expression, genomic imprinting and embryo development resembling that found in in vivo developed embryos (Doherty et al, 2000;Mann et al, 2004). Furthermore, long term culture of ES cells also affects the methylation status of imprinted genes and their totipotency (Dean et al, 1998;Horii et al, 2010). A second consideration is that XX ES cells including PGES cells are more susceptible to demethylation than XO and XY ES cells (Zvetkova et al, 2005).…”
Section: Why Epigenetic Reprogramming Occurred In Pges Cells?mentioning
confidence: 99%