“…amplicon sequencing, bait capture techniques) are likely needed if measures of epigenetic age are to be scaled to stand and population applications (Meek & Larson, 2019). Due to the age distributions of our sampled trees, age predictions for our individuals older than 55 years of age were poor, which may have contributed to the greater MAE from our clocks compared to those predicting ages for many vertebrate species (Bertucci et al, 2021;Bors et al, 2021;Lemaître et al, 2020;Meer, Podolskiy, Tyshkovskiy, & Gladyshev, 2018;Stubbs et al, 2017). As we initially removed sites not present in at least 80% of our individuals and many of our trees were within stand ages (Cunningham, n.d.;Li et al, 1999;Stiff & Stansfield, 2003), additional sampling of older trees could allow for retention of higher numbers of cytosine sites whose methylation status remains dynamic in later life, allowing for more accurate age predictions of older trees in further clock studies.…”