2018
DOI: 10.1101/352138
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epigenetic analysis identifies factors driving racial disparity in prostate cancer

Abstract: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most leading cause of death in men worldwide. African American men (AA) represent more aggressive form of PCa as compared to Caucasian (CA) counterparts. Evidence suggests that genetic and other biological factors could account for the observed racial disparity. We analyzed the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) dataset (2015) for existing epigenetic variation in AA and CA prostate cancer patients, and carried out Reduced Representation Bisulphite Sequencing (RRBS) analysis to id… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite heterogeneities in methodology and geographic focus, all 49 studies mirror the growing perception that epigenetic markers, and particularly DNA methylation (98%; along with one including RNA non‐coding, Li et al, 2020), are a potential basis for explaining ethnic or race‐based differences in health, disease incidence, aging, or reactions to exposures or drugs (Adkins et al, 2011; Barfield et al, 2014; Davis Lynn et al, 2019; Heyn et al, 2013; Li et al, 2020; Needham et al, 2015; Rai et al, 2019; Rawlik et al, 2017; Song et al, 2015). As one study claims, “DNA methylation diversity is a source of variability in human groups at macro and microgeographical scales” (Giuliani et al, 2016; similarly McKennan et al, 2020) and, given that it is considered “highly divergent between populations” (Fraser et al, 2012) can be used to elucidate variation in biological traits or different effects of environmental exposures on racially defined populations: That is, using the terminology of these studies, African American, European, Caucasians (sic), Hispanic, Chinese, or Western (see Table S1, column 3 for complete overview).…”
Section: A Scoping Review Of Environmental Epigenetics Dohad and Race...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite heterogeneities in methodology and geographic focus, all 49 studies mirror the growing perception that epigenetic markers, and particularly DNA methylation (98%; along with one including RNA non‐coding, Li et al, 2020), are a potential basis for explaining ethnic or race‐based differences in health, disease incidence, aging, or reactions to exposures or drugs (Adkins et al, 2011; Barfield et al, 2014; Davis Lynn et al, 2019; Heyn et al, 2013; Li et al, 2020; Needham et al, 2015; Rai et al, 2019; Rawlik et al, 2017; Song et al, 2015). As one study claims, “DNA methylation diversity is a source of variability in human groups at macro and microgeographical scales” (Giuliani et al, 2016; similarly McKennan et al, 2020) and, given that it is considered “highly divergent between populations” (Fraser et al, 2012) can be used to elucidate variation in biological traits or different effects of environmental exposures on racially defined populations: That is, using the terminology of these studies, African American, European, Caucasians (sic), Hispanic, Chinese, or Western (see Table S1, column 3 for complete overview).…”
Section: A Scoping Review Of Environmental Epigenetics Dohad and Race...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only three articles (6%) mention or recognize the importance of wider socio‐structural factors as “drivers of racial health differences” (Pepin et al, 2021; see also Lynn et al, 2019, Tsegaselassie et al, 2021). Reversibility is explicitly highlighted by 14 articles (28%) but most discussions of this are brief and often limited to the conclusion, with occasional reference to prospective pharmaceutical or therapeutic interventions (Chan et al, 2017; Demerath et al, 2015; Devaney et al, 2015; Enokida et al, 2005; Lynn et al, 2019; Okosun et al, 2000; Pepin et al, 2021; Pheiffer et al, 2020; Rai et al, 2019; Salihu et al, 2016; Tajuddin et al, 2019; Wang et al, 2016; Wiley et al, 2013; Zhu et al, 2016). v One significant exception is a study by Giuliani et al (2016) that emphasizes reversibility and variability as a theme throughout the article.…”
Section: A Scoping Review Of Environmental Epigenetics Dohad and Race...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84 The importance of epigenetic events in racial disparity is increasingly recognized. [85][86][87][88] One of the primary characteristics of cancer cells is altered metabolism (i.e., the Warburg effect). Inhibitors of glycolytic metabolism in tumors affect epigenetic modifications.…”
Section: Unanswered Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking prostate cancer as an example, there are 59 featured DMGs curated from 5 publications (Figure 3B ) ( 32–36 ). Among them, there are 42 intersections with differential analysis results of project HRA000099 in the Data module of MethBank 4.0, primarily including the key androgen-responsive genes such as EGR1 , AR , KLK3 , and FOLH1 ( 32 , 33 , 36 ) (Figure 3D ). These curated DMGs are enriched in prostate cancer-related pathways including prostate gland development and columnar/cuboidal epithelial cell differentiation (Figure 3E ).…”
Section: New Features and Updatesmentioning
confidence: 99%