The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

epiGBS: reference-free reduced representation bisulfite sequencing

Abstract: We describe epiGBS, a reduced representation bisulfite sequencing method for cost-effective exploration and comparative analysis of DNA methylation and genetic variation in hundreds of samples de novo. This method uses genotyping by sequencing of bisulfite-converted DNA followed by reliable de novo reference construction, mapping, variant calling, and distinction of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) versus methylation variation (software is available at https://github.com/thomasvangurp/epiGBS). The output… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
157
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
157
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In future studies, a reduced‐representation bisulfite sequencing approach would allow the direct comparison of genetic and epigenetic data sets, and at a much finer scale, with substantially increased statistical power to detect epigenetic differences between populations (van Gurp et al., 2016; Robertson & Richards, 2015; Schrey et al., 2013; Trucchi et al., 2016). In addition, sequencing‐based methods provide an increased ability to disentangle the relationship of methylation variation and gene function when fragments overlap with the promoters or coding regions of genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future studies, a reduced‐representation bisulfite sequencing approach would allow the direct comparison of genetic and epigenetic data sets, and at a much finer scale, with substantially increased statistical power to detect epigenetic differences between populations (van Gurp et al., 2016; Robertson & Richards, 2015; Schrey et al., 2013; Trucchi et al., 2016). In addition, sequencing‐based methods provide an increased ability to disentangle the relationship of methylation variation and gene function when fragments overlap with the promoters or coding regions of genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess differential methylation levels in TE sequences among accessions, we used a recently developed reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) protocol that does not require a reference genome [40]. Individuals originating from the same mother plants as the ones used for genomic sequencing were grown in a common greenhouse environment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bisulfite sequencing is considered the 'gold-standard' to characterize DNA-methylation as the only method resolving nucleotide-level polymorphisms (Schrey et al, 2013;Adusumalli et al, 2014). While whole genome bisulfite sequencing is still expensive for large sample sizes, reduced representation techniques, such as RRBS (Gu et al, 2011), bsRADseq (Trucchi et al, 2016), and epiGBS (van Gurp et al, 2016) allow for cost-effective population epigenetic comparisons, partly without the need for a reference genome. Alternatively, DNA-methylation can be characterized with markers obtained via methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes, such as EpiRAD (Schield et al, 2016) and MethylRAD (Wang et al, 2015).…”
Section: A2 Epigenetic Potential To Adapt To Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%