2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidural Analgesia in Hepatic Resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
5
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
44
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have demonstrated this apparent dichotomy. 17 Although this may provide an interesting material for further study, it was beyond the capacities of the present work. Second, because of self-selection, it was not unexpected that compared with the non-EAA group, patients in the EAA group were more likely to require changes to their analgesic regimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other studies have demonstrated this apparent dichotomy. 17 Although this may provide an interesting material for further study, it was beyond the capacities of the present work. Second, because of self-selection, it was not unexpected that compared with the non-EAA group, patients in the EAA group were more likely to require changes to their analgesic regimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Indeed, other studies have demonstrated that EAA was associated with highly complex and relatively unpredictable fluid shifts and increased rates of packed red blood cell count transfusions. 8,13,17,19,20 With EAA, pharmacologically induced smooth muscle dilation allowed for increased vascular capacitance, relative hypotension, intravenous fluidYmediated hemodilution, and red blood cell count transfusions. However, this would not explain a near doubling of intraoperative blood loss for patients with EAA compared with patients without EAA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple non-randomized comparisons have been reported, however, relatively few level 1 data from randomized trials are available. [2228] Currently, the advantages and disadvantages between these two strategies continue to be debated, and the most effective strategy has not been determined. The objective of this randomized control trial (RCT) was to compare the efficacy of pain control and safety between TEA and IV-PCA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although epidural analgesia has been shown to be effective after hepatic resection without complication [22], the debate on epidural analgesia continues [23][24][25]. Coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia and other haematological abnormalities may impose additional risks of epidural haematoma formation following removal of the epidural catheter postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%