1981
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(81)90373-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidermoid carcinoma of the palate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our rate of survival at 5 years was 44.5% and is similar to those reported by other studies (21% to 76%) [18,19] . This poor prognosis could reflect higher prevalence of neck node involvement at diagnosis or higher prevalence of poor prognotic factors like p16-negative status [1] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our rate of survival at 5 years was 44.5% and is similar to those reported by other studies (21% to 76%) [18,19] . This poor prognosis could reflect higher prevalence of neck node involvement at diagnosis or higher prevalence of poor prognotic factors like p16-negative status [1] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Neck recurrence was predicted by the presence of fixed or contralateral node metastases, but not by the presence of nodal metastasis itself. Size of the primary tumor and histological grade was significantly associated with survival, and clinical stage was the most important prognostic indicator [30] . Recent retrospective series with 26 to 146 upper alveolar ridge and hard palate cases reported a neck lymph node involvement between 11% and 36.6%, and regional recurrence in N0 neck from 14% to 27% [1,[5][6][7][8] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the abundance of literature investigating the prognosis of the various stages and treatment options of SCC primaries of other oral cavity subsites, recent studies on maxillary alveolus and hard palate cancers have predominantly been limited to reports from institutional experiences and other small patient number series 1, 4–6. Larger case series, including reports on as many as 62 to 123 patients with SCC of the hard palate, were conducted on patients treated in the 1920s to the 1970s prior to the creation of standardized staging systems or routine use of modern imaging and therapeutic modalities, or grouped with other nonoral cavity cancer subsites for statistical analysis 11, 12. Since the institution of standardized staging criteria to classify disease severity and to guide treatment strategy, some authors have more recently suggested that the UICC/AJCC staging system may inadequately predict the prognosis of patients with SCC of the maxillary alveolus and hard palate, and have therefore proposed alternative staging systems for these specific subsites 2, 3…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 In contrast, for maxillary alveolus and hard palate tumors, it has traditionally been believed that the risk of nodal metastases is not high enough to warrant ELND. [10][11][12][13][14] Therefore, in the majority of cases, in the absence of clinical evidence of cervical nodal metastases, neck dissection is generally not recommended, independent of the size or depth. [15][16][17][18] Several single-institution analyses have recently reported higher than expected rates of nodal failure among patients undergoing surgery, without neck dissection, for SCCs of the maxillary alveolus and hard palate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%