Epidermal Microbiomes of Triakis Semifasciata Are Consistent Across Captive and Wild Environments

Abstract

Background: Characterizations of sharks-microbe systems in wild environments have outlined patterns of species-specific microbiomes; however, whether captivity affects these trends has yet to be determined. We used high-throughput shotgun sequencing to assess the epidermal microbiome belonging to leopard sharks (Triakis semifasciata) in captive (Birch Aquarium, La Jolla California), semi-captive (<1 year in captivity; Scripps Institute of Oceanography, California) and wild environments (Moss Landing and La Jolla, California). Results: Here we report captive environments do not drive microbiome composition of T. semifasciata to significantly diverge from wild counterparts as life-long captive sharks maintain a species-specific epidermal microbiome resembling those associated with semi-captive and wild populations. Major taxonomic composition shifts observed were inverse changes of top taxonomic contributors across captive duration, specifically an increase of Pseudoalteromonadaceae and consequent decrease of Pseudomonadaceae relative abundance as T. semifasciata increased duration in captive conditions. Moreover, we show captivity did not lead to significant losses in microbial α-diversity of shark epidermal communities. Finally, we present a novel association between T. semifasciata and the Muricauda genus as MAGs revealed a consistent relationship across captive, semi-captive, and wild populations. Conclusions: Our report illustrates the importance of conservation programs for coastal fishes as epidermally-associated microbes of near-shore shark species do not suffer detrimental impacts from long or short-term captivity. Our findings also expand on current understanding of shark epidermal microbiomes, explore the effects of ecologically different scenarios on benthic shark microbe associations, and highlight novel microbial associations that are consistent across captive gradients.