1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb03001.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidermal focussing and effects on light utilization in Oxalis acetosella

Abstract: lmage analysis was used to quantify the lateral heterogeneity of the radiation field within the palisade of Oxialis acetosella L. leaves. Oxalis acetosella epidermal cells focus light up to four times incident irradiance, resulting in regions of high and low internal fluenec rate within the palisade. Chlorophyll fluorescence from leaves irradiated with directional light was found to originate primarily from palisade cell chloroplasts located within focal zones. When the internal radiation field was made more h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaf optical properties may be indirectly affected by changes in leaf anatomy through their important role in the determination of light distribution within the leaf . For example, convex epidermal cells can act to collect and focus light, which may increase the probability of interception of photons by chloroplasts (Bone et al, 1985;Myers et al, 1994); the convexity of epidermal cells varied among species in the present study (personal observation), which could alter the focusing properties without necessarily changing epidermal dimensions. Additionally, palisade mesophyll cell shape may alter light penetration within the leaf, changes in spongy mesophyll cell shape can affect optical path length, and leaf anatomy influences chloroplast distribution; all of which could affect leaf optical properties (Terashima and Saeki, 1983;Vogelmann and Martin, 1993;DeLucia et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Leaf optical properties may be indirectly affected by changes in leaf anatomy through their important role in the determination of light distribution within the leaf . For example, convex epidermal cells can act to collect and focus light, which may increase the probability of interception of photons by chloroplasts (Bone et al, 1985;Myers et al, 1994); the convexity of epidermal cells varied among species in the present study (personal observation), which could alter the focusing properties without necessarily changing epidermal dimensions. Additionally, palisade mesophyll cell shape may alter light penetration within the leaf, changes in spongy mesophyll cell shape can affect optical path length, and leaf anatomy influences chloroplast distribution; all of which could affect leaf optical properties (Terashima and Saeki, 1983;Vogelmann and Martin, 1993;DeLucia et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Such information is useful in evaluating the radiation reflectance and transmittance at whole-canopy scale and in studying plant-environment interaction. The specific peculiarities of the leaf surface (wax layer, shape of the epidermal cells, cuticular thickening, trichomes) play an important role in the variability of optical parameters (Eller 1977;Martin et al 1991;Myers et al 1994;Vogelmann 1994). In our investigations the scaly trichomes of the xeromorphic olive trees, but not the tapering ones of fig, increased reflectance and attenuated transmittance over the exploited spectral range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the present simulation we did not consider the effect of refraction and focussing of light by epidermal cells near the surface of the leaf (Myers et al 1994), which may interact with the non-uniform distribution of chlorophyll to influence the SPAD-[chl] area relationship. Although epidermal focussing of radiation may act to directing photons to chlorophyll dense positions in the leaf (Vogelmann 1989) the net effect of chlorophyll heterogeneity is generally to decrease A (Richter and Fukshansky 1996), and the general shape of the simulated SPAD-[chl] area relationship should be the same also if the effect of epidermal focussing was considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%